Replies

What have you got against Trump/Vance?

I have nothing against them. I very much want them to win, and I very much recommend against bringing up this topic in any official manner, such as involving the courts. The Trump campaign needs to absolutely not talk about this and no other group should bring it up as an official complaint either.

All you’re doing with your blathering on about NBC is ignoring the real issues that surrounds Kamala.

My "blathering" is simply acknowledging that what I have always believed, I still believe. I believe the courts have steered the nation wrong and have ignorantly misinterpreted the difference between "citizen" and "natural born citizen."

I also believe I am discussing this with people on a website, and I am not trying to make it part of a national campaign. I believe that ship sailed with Obama, and the courts have stiffened their wrongheaded understanding and will simply not entertain anyone questioning their previous judgements.

You’re trying to distance Free Republic and conservatism from focusing on real and serious issues by trolling us with this eligibility bull crap.

Not at all, I consider this a real issue, and a serious issue, though the vast majority of Americans remain ignorant on the topic and unaware of how serious it can be when it is not adhered to as the founders intended.

NBC seems to be a psyop. NBCers could say that they are on the side of truth and "natural law" and my view is the psyop. Fair enough, can't argue that point. Must confine arguments to the facts of each case. In this thread, ignoring the 1898 case law which defines NBC relative to qualification for presidency very clearly.

I posted in many threads debating the BC font expert Polarik. Mostly harmless fun but clearly the Obama admin got mileage out of it handing out altered paper copies of a contemporary document and letting one reporter feel the embossing on the contemporary doc that was shipped from Hawaii. All a giant circus.

Likewise posted in some of the threads promoting the two (among other)"experts" Dr Shiva's scatterplots of Michigan votes and Dr Frank. They tried to prove that vote tabulators gave incorrect results. But in most cases nationwide the tabulators produce the same results (or close) each time they operate. The main problem with the rigged or hacked voting machine theories is they distract from the very real problems of mass mailed (unsolicited) ballots, harvesting, lax or non-existent signature checking. The Georgia signature checking audit was a sham, only auditing the county that did relatively rigorous checking and not Fulton.