>> set him up to fail at Trump debate
really?
I was surprised, too. His tough guy debate challenge made me much afraid /s
“>> set him up to fail at Trump debate - really?”
Makes PERFECT SENSE to me. Imagine trying to get rid of him WITHOUT the debate, or even worse, the first debate in September.
It was OBVIOUSLY a setup and the only thing that surprised me is that Trump took the bait.
“set him up to fail at Trump debate”
I truly believe that. His debate performance wasn’t any worse than so many other of his appearances that the Rats said nothing about, but as soon as that debate was over they started piling up on him.
The timing of the debate was also well thought out. They fully expected a poor performance, and wanted a couple of months before he officially got nominated so they could get rid of him.
Trump should have not accepted any debates until after both conventions.
It was all staged and worked like a charm for the Rats.
Poor Jo.
The left had planned to take out Trump so Biden was going to be unopposed. Until the Democrats failed again. If Trump was gone the debate wouldn’t matter. The media would fix that.
“Set him up to fail at Trump debate
really?”
^
The DNC is continuously PLOTTING
really?
I know, right? Nobody had to do a thing to set Joe up. Trump could have done any debate any time against Joe without prep and with his eyes closed. The fact is, Joe is incapacitated and fundamentally incapable of the presidency on any of his best days, ever; but he ran his mouth and challenged Trump over and over. He's lucky Trump didn't make it look even worse for him.