Do we know if Oswald-Crooks even took a shot?
I see no evidence that anyone shot before him. The forensics I saw, from unaltered audio recording of the scene (NOT anything from Alphabet agencies) showed 3 first shots with fairly light report and close spacing of shot and sound wave delay were typical for .223. The next 6 rounds were totally different in distance delay and sound, there was echo not in the first 3 shots.
The 6 rounds were almost all identical in appearance, but distance timing had 2 irregularities. So it is likely that it was either 2 weapons, with different loads or barrel length. Both of them had echo’s.
The NYT article is a cover up attempt. They said all 9 rounds were similar. They were NOT.
I think the 6 rounds were from a larger caliber. And conclusion was that it was from a 2nd story window in one of the buildings.
Now, the real test, sharing info from wounds and the amount of damage. If .308 or .338 the damage would be very bad.
The rate of fire of the 6 rounds was much faster, indicating less time targeting. The 6 rounds might have been a chaos creation, to cover the 2 other shooter exit.
The FBI, DOJ, DHS and SS will all attempt to sell the single shooter story line. It is clearly false.
There is a woman who was near President with her children at the time of the attack. She swears there were at least 2 different shooters. From different shooting points.
I’m certain he did.
We won’t know if he took a shot until the FBI gets done with its investigation next year. One week has passed and the Feds won’t even tell us how man expelled bullet casings were found on the roof.