Some thoughts were shared about this subject the other day. Woods is correct. 
Great statement by Woods. Thanks. And BTW that constitutional process, should Jill get Joe to mark his x on a letter to the House and Senate contesting any action to remove him would then under the 25th ammendment require a 2/3 vote of both the house and the senate to remove crazy Joe.
Fight, baby, fight! Just don’t fling me into the briar patch.
Good points as always from James Woods.
Trying to think like a democrat:
If they could find a way for Biden to be assassinated and blamed on Trump extremists, they could kill two birds with one stone.
James is astute...as usual.
That!
Woods misses the fact that the party can do what they want. It has nothing to do with constitutional law. The “party” has its own rules.
Please correct me if I’m wrong.
But it is indeed ironic that the party is in the process of selecting the “best candidate” to “save our democracy.”