Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Cannon's Unexpected--and Unearned--Gift to Jack Smith
Declassified Live ^ | 7/15/24 | Julie Kelley

Posted on 07/15/2024 2:53:33 PM PDT by CFW

Jack Smith should be writing a thank you note to U.S. District Court Judge Aileen M. Cannon right about now.

By dismissing the so-called classified documents case against Donald Trump and his two co-defendants, Cannon just spared the special counsel and his team months of continued humiliation in her Florida courtroom and, eventually, in front of the nation.

In a 93-page order issued on Monday, Cannon, in her typically cautious and detailed manner, explained why Smith’s appointment violated the Constitution; Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith in November 2022 to take over the Department of Justice’s existing investigations into Trump’s role in the events of January 6 and for allegedly hoarding national defense files at Mar-a-Lago after he left office.

Trump’s lawyers earlier this year filed a motion to dismiss the 40-count indictment, handed down by Smith in July 2023, based on the fact Smith’s appointment violated both the Appointments Clause and and the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution. Smith, of course, opposed the motion, arguing that internal DOJ regulations and a random set of federal statutes—none that specifically designates the appointment of a special counsel since the Independent Counsel Act expired in 1999—enabled his position.

[snip]

Smith’s last hope to salvage any remaining shards of his unjustified reputation lies in the friendly courtroom of Judge Tanya Chutkan but that will be another painful slog.

But for now, the only person who should be happier than Donald Trump and his co-defendants that this case is closed is Jack Smith.

(Excerpt) Read more at declassified.live ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aileencannon; arrestgarland; arrestjacksmith; documents; jacksmith; judgecannon; trump; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Many legal scholars and attorneys have mocked Julie Kelley's take on the Florida case over the past few months.

But she called it! She called it every step of the way.

1 posted on 07/15/2024 2:53:33 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

And if you want Technofog’s opinion on Judge Cannon’s ruling, it is here:

https://technofog.substack.com/

On July 1, when the Supreme Court issued its opinion concerning Presidential immunity, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion:

“I am not sure that any office for the Special Counsel has been established by law as the Constitution requires.”

For Justice Thomas, “is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies,” then Special Counsel Smith is not “duly authorized” and “he cannot proceed with this prosecution.”

Today, Judge Cannon, who is overseeing Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case against Donald Trump, et al., in the Southern District of Florida, took those arguments to their logical conclusion and dismissed the Special Counsel’s case against Trump.

According to Judge Cannon’s order and memorandum:

“The Superseding Indictment is DISMISSED because Special Counsel Smith’s appointment violates the Appointment’s Clause of the United States Constitution.”

To reach this conclusion, Judge Cannon had to answer a threshold question: whether there is a statute in the U.S. Code that authorizes Special Counsel Smith to conduct the prosecution. For Judge Cannon, “the answer is no.”


2 posted on 07/15/2024 2:55:32 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Cannon just spared the special counsel and his team months of continued humiliation in her Florida courtroom and

A nonsense take. Smith is an ideologue and drone who was pushed forward by Garland and the deep-state specifically to create months of anti-Trump headlines and legal harassment.

Garland is a life-time DOJ apparatchik and even a SCOTUS candidate. He obviously knew courts (at least constitutionalist judges) would raise serious questions about Smith's position and lawfare against a President.

there's no humiliation whatsoever. Garland and Smith may not have achieved 100% of their goals, but they achieved 75%

3 posted on 07/15/2024 2:59:54 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“The ruling prompted former federal prosecutors to float suggestions on social media that Smith should dismiss the case before U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon rather than appealing her decision to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The Justice Department could then try to refile the case either in a different jurisdiction or with a different team of prosecutors.”


4 posted on 07/15/2024 3:00:13 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

How many Special Counsel cases from the past can be revisited?


5 posted on 07/15/2024 3:06:09 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

They are saying they will appeal. Just go away already, you gave it your best, now back to the rock you crawled out from.


6 posted on 07/15/2024 3:09:12 PM PDT by small farm girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

So Mr. Elite FBI Director, how much has this charade cost the taxpayer?


7 posted on 07/15/2024 3:09:28 PM PDT by From The Deer Stand (Mp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I read the entire decision. Cannon is a brilliant legal scholar worthy of eventual appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court.


8 posted on 07/15/2024 3:12:42 PM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

In other Court news, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals takes Trump team’s case against DA Alvin Bragg and Judge Merchan.

The case against Trump, involving 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, spearheaded by Bragg, has faced enormous skepticism, with claims of political motivation from both sides.


9 posted on 07/15/2024 3:13:04 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW

since Jack is illegitimate and has no authority to spend $$ so who’s footing the bill????


10 posted on 07/15/2024 3:14:47 PM PDT by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Well, the D.C. Deep State Circuit will rule Smith’s appointment is constituitional. If Cannon is affirmed on appeal, then SCOTUS must decide the isse. Cannon delayed and timed her ruling so that any remand on appeal is after the election. Trump will most certainly promote her.


11 posted on 07/15/2024 3:19:18 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

That’s just stupid. He has been disgraced. And President Trump doesn’t need the distraction.


12 posted on 07/15/2024 3:19:22 PM PDT by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Does CFW stand for Constant Foolish Words?

Asking for a FRiend...

13 posted on 07/15/2024 3:19:49 PM PDT by politicket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Just heard that the DOJ has approved Smith filing an appeal. Will be funny if he does and they quickly reject. He’s not going to win.


14 posted on 07/15/2024 3:21:30 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Trump / Vance 2024 - Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avital2
so who’s footing the bill????

Look in the mirror. There you'll find your answer. LOL!!

15 posted on 07/15/2024 3:21:57 PM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

How many millions of $ did she save the tax payer from this scumbag’s unlimited budget.


16 posted on 07/15/2024 3:27:46 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (Brandon's pronouns: Xi/Hur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

To revisit a special prosecutor case you must first have a special prosecutor. This case didn’t have one that is why it was dismissed


17 posted on 07/15/2024 3:28:04 PM PDT by cableguymn (Insert tag line here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

The whole purpose was to smear Trump’s name before the election.....


18 posted on 07/15/2024 3:29:17 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Trump should sue.


19 posted on 07/15/2024 3:36:10 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I’d also read a lot of crap from her that was dead wrong, too numerous to list.

But yeah, she got this one right.


20 posted on 07/15/2024 3:36:42 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson