> Speculation is rampant everywhere <
True that. And that speculation ranges from the reasonable to the insane.
> Why not wait for facts vs hearsay. <
And here I must respectfully disagree. This is a chat site, and not a jury room. So speculation should be okay. It’s the give and take of polite conversation.
But there’s another problem. You can bet the FBI and their Deep State associates will do their very best to suppress the facts here. So waiting for the facts might mean an infinite wait.
Any truth might only appear on sites like this.
“waiting for the facts might mean an infinite wait”
Yup—they are still dribbling out new facts about the JFK assassination—many of them very significant (though not well publicized) after sixty plus years.
The Warren Commission Report was one big pack of lies.
The earliest investigative books (Mark Lane, Harold Weisberg) opened up important lines of inquiry—but they probably knew less than 10% of the information now known to serious researchers even in the specific areas they covered.
The Garrison trial had some dead ends but also some interesting new leads.
The 1976 House of Representatives investigation provided a lot of information about the CIA’s involvement but they were sabotaged by Deep State insiders at various points.
The deathbed confession of E. Howard Hunt to his son St. John Hunt named names and nailed down some other loose ends.
There have also been some excellent books of LBJ’s involvement as well—Roger Stone’s book is the best imho.
Document releases in the last few years have provided a lot of other interesting details.
Most Freepers (and most Americans) are not familiar with most of these details.
Sometimes you can kill a story by pushing a false narrative over and over for decades and just hope folks lose interest.
Post of the day. Thank you
Speculation when reasonable is tolerable but the insane you mention is usually the norm.
The truth will come out eventually, it always does. There were probably 5,000 plus cell phones taking pictures and videos.