Glad that they are paying the price for putting out fake news.
Hey, at least it’s not $787 million(Fox/Dominion) /s
That’s a tough hit for any guy to take!
It needs to be at least £100 Million for the damage she’s done.
They wanted to smear Trump so bad...
That’s all there was to this.
Now, suffer the consequences. I hope Smirky McSmirkface has to pay it out of her own pocket.
That's a stretch given their current reputations.
Too late
Looks like the judge is a better fact-checker! Too funny.
According to court documents, key decision makers at NBC, including Chris Scholl, questioned the veracity of the whistleblower’s claims.
Scholl pointed out the lack of evidence and described the accusations before ultimately approving the articles and broadcasts.
Scholl’s internal communications showed skepticism, as he stated, “We don’t know the truth.”
Maddow and Hayes also expressed their doubts during internal discussions, questioning the whistleblower‘s credibility.
But despite concerns, the network ran with the story,
Did they learn a lesson?
Who did make the decision?
Everyone caught sneaking into the country should be sterilized. It’s just common sense.
Imagine the size of the payout if MSNBC was held responsible for their “Russiagate” reporting. They’d never recover.
Pin money for the Illuminati, there should be two extra zeros and then some.
Headline “to cost” article “could cost”.
Lying clickbait scumbags. I’m sick of it.
I doubt if any real damage was done to Rachel's reputation, though. When everyone around you is playing in the same sewer, nobody notices the smell.
Clickbait headline.
headline “Rachel Maddow’s ‘False Reporting’ to Cost”
story “MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow could cost”
later in story “filing a $30 million defamation lawsuit”
to cost
then
“could” cost
and then
someone filed a lawsuit
They’ll probably get raises, or promoted.
Elite Leftists always fail upwards.
30 million? I thought 500 million was the norm now?
How can you “tarnish” Maddow’s reputation? That would take a lot of doing. /s
Why do people on here continually post articles with false, lying headlines?
Isn’t it quite ironic that a mag posts an articlw with a false headline about false claims.