Posted on 07/11/2024 9:18:43 AM PDT by Red Badger
I doubt if any real damage was done to Rachel's reputation, though. When everyone around you is playing in the same sewer, nobody notices the smell.
Clickbait headline.
headline “Rachel Maddow’s ‘False Reporting’ to Cost”
story “MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow could cost”
later in story “filing a $30 million defamation lawsuit”
to cost
then
“could” cost
and then
someone filed a lawsuit
They’ll probably get raises, or promoted.
Elite Leftists always fail upwards.
30 million? I thought 500 million was the norm now?
How can you “tarnish” Maddow’s reputation? That would take a lot of doing. /s
Or Alex Jones, who owes over a billion dollars.
UFO’s and giant lizard creatures should sue to get their day in court.
Why do people on here continually post articles with false, lying headlines?
Isn’t it quite ironic that a mag posts an articlw with a false headline about false claims.
This is no big deal (work with me here). The employer will pay the judgment and life and the perps will go on as b before. The only way to make an impact is to have the perps pay out of their own pocket; otherwise they’re just being indemnified.
How about the fake Covid reporting?
“A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else.”
Comcast NBC will suck it up and write it off as the cost of doing business as fake news
The tarnished reputation part is a given.
Why do you format your posts like that? It’s annoying at best.
She’s just a reader the real culprits are the writers and executives who approved the text.
One wounded and more to go.
Punish the LSM for its LIES.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.