[Dr. Franklin]

In addition, the prosecutor must not only show that the act could be an unofficial act, but that no aspect of the act could be construed to be within the “outer perimeter” of the president’s official duties.
Take the speech and texts from Trump on J6. Clearly those could be considered the acts of a candidate, as Trump would have done the same if he had not been president. However, because communicating with the voters on a matter of national importance clearly falls within that “outer perimeter” of presidential duties, and it would be impossible to untangle the two. So I don’t see how any charges related to those communications could stand.

Trump clearly determined there was foreign election interference. That is clear from his meeting with Syndey Powell, Gen. Mike Flynn and others. He had the option of calling forth the militia to address a stolen election. He declined that option in favor of litigation and a peaceful protest. Trump could have done far more consitutionally as POTUS than what he did. If he had, Biden might never have taken the oath of office.

[Bob434]

a pundit just stated that prosecutors now can’t use staff notes, or conversations as evidence against a president working on official business- if so, that is huge-

[butterdezillion]

Is it Nina Totenberg’s sister who has been sitting on the GA elections fraud case (where manipulation of the vote tallies remotely was demonstrated in court) for far, far beyond the 3 months she said it would take for her to decide the case?

I wonder what is taking her so long. It seemed pretty cut-and-dried. And another election process hangs in the balance in the meantime. Her delay when she knows that another election could be similarly stolen if she doesn’t act could be understood as election interference all by itself, could it not?

The claims that Trump was acting only in his own interest is blown out of the water by that case, and by what was already demonstrated in that court. The only reason the whole J6 fedsurrection and all the claims about 2020 being honest can even continue is because judges refused to hear the evidence. And now the judge has the evidence but won’t make the clear and obvious ruling that is called for.