Posted on 06/29/2024 10:39:56 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The NYT has no problem when SCOTUS increases the power of the central government.
Yep. Look at the latest SC ruling on firearms. Liberal states continue to put up roadblocks to firearms ownership. Practically every onerous, arbitrary, unconstitutional bureaucratic rule will have to be challenged in court.
This, this, this!!!!!
The exact opposite of “imperial”.
Here is Roberts's opinion on this issue:
The Framers appreciated that the laws judges would necessarily apply in resolving those disputes would not always be clear. Cognizant of the limits of human language and foresight, they anticipated that “[a]ll new laws, though penned with the greatest technical skill, and passed on the fullest and most mature deliberation,” would be “more or less obscure and equivocal, until their meaning” was settled “by a series of particular discussions and adjudications.” The Federalist No. 37, p. 236 (J. Cooke ed. 1961) (J. Madison).
Thomas should’ve brought up the fact that government agencies are drowning in affirmative action, hires, instead of hiring the best and the brightest for their technical expertise. That might’ve been true a generation ago, but that is certainly no longer true today. Thomas missed a golden opportunity to highlight this fact in his, concurring opinion on the Chevron case.
the left LOVED the supreme court when the court was making up crap out of thin air and ruling for them.
But just like with gerrymandering they suddenly hate it when things turn against them.
exactly! how DARE the supreme court say laws need to be passed by congress!
/s
“WAAAAAAAA. Some bureaucratic tyrant lost some power to rule over Americans. Communities of color, BIPOC, women, an LGBTQWTF hardest hit.”
I always got a kick out of the ATF website that says, “Myth: The ATF does not write gun laws”
Completely omitting the arbitrarily decide what is legal and illegal without any concern from congress..
An often-overooked but absolutely awful decision.
“They” are whining about SCrOTUS so something good and just must have happened.
Oh goody! if the NY Slimes is upset about it then it must be a positive development!
Totalitarian freaks at the NYT upset that unelected bureaucrats have no law-making powers.
Cry harder, fascist pigs.
Congress has been allowed to write ambiguous laws on purpose so they don’t have to take the political heat from the laws they wrote. The “system” gets the blame. Well no more now no more interpretation by unelected bureaucrats the courts can and should strike down an ambiguous law and make Congress pass what they mean in English with full responsibility as it should be on the representatives who answer ultimately to the voters before the fraud went rampant and voting mattered. Suck it bureaucrats you are the problem.
To be honest they didn't overturn it they rewrote it, abortion is still legal if a state says it is. Wasn't legal before Roe.
Judge in Kansas City used his robe to raise taxes and got away with it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.