“...to protect the integrity of a judicial proceeding.”
What integrity?
Yeah, I think Trump’s argument should be that there isn’t any integrity left to protect; everybody already knows it’s a political sham.
I do wonder what will come of the Michael Anderson issue though - where he posted on the court’s social media page the day before the verdict, saying his cousin was a juror and they were gonna convict Trump. That is potential witness tampering and definitely against the jurors’ rules, and should render the whole thing a mistrial.