You know this decision is bad if this Tammy Faye Baker looking broad is celebrating
To: ChicagoConservative27
I suspect Hochul is a "transgender". She looks very mannish.
Hochul is not feminine at all. She looks like a bitch butch bull dyke.
2 posted on
06/21/2024 6:07:47 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Hochul needs to try hooking for a living. She makes a lousy New Yawk Idiot politician.
4 posted on
06/21/2024 7:22:05 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(When did WE decide to make America a UN 5-Star Asylum Paradise for Socialist losers?)
To: ChicagoConservative27
The decision is not nearly as bad as they are making it out to be.
It is probably the best we could do given the current makeup of the court.
The decision did not address due process issues, and is an "as applied" which means to this case only decision, rather than a general decision upholding the law.
It just means, in some cases, such as this one, the law may be constitutional.
5 posted on
06/21/2024 7:44:10 PM PDT by
marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
To: ChicagoConservative27
In the Rahimi case, Rahimi stipulated to the facts and agreed to the decision.
The opinion is not precedential for cases where the facts are disputed and the order not agreed to.
6 posted on
06/21/2024 7:45:27 PM PDT by
marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
To: ChicagoConservative27
She didn’t celebrate the bumpstock decision.
From the New York Post: “ Gov. Kathy Hochul issued a statement Friday in which she erroneously linked the illegal use of bump stocks to the 2022 mass shooting at a Buffalo supermarket where a white supremecist killed 10 black people.”
…
“ Asked later about the misstatement by the Associated Press, Hochul spokesperson Maggie Halley said the governor had only been speaking “generally” about “dangerous, illegal modifications” of weapons made to inflict mass casualties “including bump stocks.”
7 posted on
06/21/2024 8:12:55 PM PDT by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
noting that it shows a “glimmer of hope” from the justices.There was only one ideological 6-3 split out of all of yesterday's decisions with Munoz.
Otherwise, some interesting pairings here.
9 posted on
06/22/2024 3:49:30 AM PDT by
Drew68
To: ChicagoConservative27
This USSC decision was mistaken, and sets back the 2A one more baby step.
Shall not be infringed is pretty clear, and no, there isn’t any room for restrictions.
If a person is fit for society, there should not be restrictions upon their ownership of firearms.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson