Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Unless Trump is a resident of Missouri, or has his business headquartered there, there’s no real conflict between the states, nor does Missouri have standing.


3 posted on 06/20/2024 9:59:11 PM PDT by Bob Wills is still the king (Just a Texas Playboy at heart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bob Wills is still the king
Unless Trump is a resident of Missouri, or has his business headquartered there, there’s no real conflict between the states, nor does Missouri have standing.

No one really knows what standing means other than a court doesn't want to hear a case. If Trump is on the ballot in MO, then MO should have standing to ensure a free and fair election. Otherwise, FL could join the lawsuit and that issue goes away.
4 posted on 06/20/2024 10:03:58 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bob Wills is still the king
Unless Trump is a resident of Missouri, or has his business headquartered there, there’s no real conflict between the states, nor does Missouri have standing.

Still, throw s*** at the wall and see what sticks. Works for partisan Democrat prosecutors.

We should be doing this and much more everywhere.

5 posted on 06/20/2024 10:07:55 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bob Wills is still the king

“nor does Missouri have standing”
The gag order prevents Missouri citizens from hearing Trumps opinions. This violates Missouri citizens First Amendment rights.


13 posted on 06/21/2024 1:45:22 AM PDT by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bob Wills is still the king

“nor does Missouri have standing.”

“Standing” is whatever a court wants it to be. There’s a legal definition, but SCOTUS ignored that when TX, et al., challenged the 2020 election. Every state had standing, but SCOTUS said “no standing”.

We’ll see what SCOTUS pulls out of its ass this time.


18 posted on 06/21/2024 4:34:06 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Navarro didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bob Wills is still the king

We all have standing if a federal court agrees with the proposition that New York State is engaging in election interference.


20 posted on 06/21/2024 5:55:57 AM PDT by yldstrk ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bob Wills is still the king

I don’t agree with you that Missouri doesn’t have standing. Obviously lawyers in Missouri think they do or they wouldn’t risk getting shot down by the so called “Supreme” Court.

That said, I do agree in general that the Supreme Court (also lawyers) frivously uses “standing” as a way to dodge tough decisions.......so they very well MIGHT, as you say, rule that Missouri has no standing.

AS F’d up as things are right now, most of us pray they won’t throw Missouri out on standing and will act to protect their own sorry assed judciciary..


22 posted on 06/21/2024 7:28:16 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bob Wills is still the king

THEY WOULD HAVE STANDING SINCE THIS IS A FEDERAL ELECTION—IMO.


24 posted on 06/21/2024 12:02:50 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson