[cowboyusa]

I understand who globalists are and what they do. No hard evidence, but thier wouldn’t be.

[Uncle Miltie]

“I understand who globalists are and what they do. No hard evidence, but thier wouldn’t be.”

A person may have conjecture based on circumstance. That’s reasonable. I disagree with you based on all the facts that I have seen, but I could be wrong.

The logi_cal869 dude states as unequivocal FACT that Israel knew about the attacks in advance, and “permitted them to occur”. He does so without evidence continuously.

There’s conjecture, which is fair without conclusive evidence, and there is certainty without proof, which is idiocy. Indeed, given the subject at hand, certainty without proof veers mighty close to the “Evil Jew” trope.

So I’m kinda thingy about the distinction

Thanks for your clarification.