Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude
My point is that it should be treated no differently than contract law. It will actually be much more stable that way.

As someone else pointed out earlier in this thread, a contract for a car loan is legally stronger in the U.S. today than a marriage. How pathetic. So the government should treat a marriage like a car loan to make it stronger.

58 posted on 06/18/2024 6:47:04 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (“Ain't it funny how the night moves … when you just don't seem to have as much to lose.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Marriage cannot be treated like contract law because the implications of marriage are far reaching, affecting others not a party to the narrow “contract.”

Contracts ONLY affect the parties who agree to it. That doesn’t describe marriage.


67 posted on 06/18/2024 8:13:22 AM PDT by fwdude ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson