Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27
Look, you guys conspired to not indict Joe Biden with the flimsy excuse that he is too feeble and decrepit to be properly tried in court. But you want it both ways by saying that although he is a mental basket case, he still is capable of being president.

Given that, would it not be the very right of the electorate in this country to hear the actual audio tapes of Biden's testimony? For two reasons: 1) to make sure the DOJ didn't sanitize the transcripts, and 2) to be able to make a fully informed decision when we vote in November.

Wouldn't NOT releasing the audio be election interference? Not an attack, Mr Garland, it is a legitimate matter that the public has the right to know the facts.

13 posted on 06/13/2024 8:34:34 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fhayek

They already admitted to sanitizing the transcripts.

My guess is that they lied about how drastically they sanitized it.


76 posted on 06/13/2024 10:40:45 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson