Constitutional Standards: Injury in Fact, Causation, and Redressability
“Although the Court has been inconsistent, it has now settled upon the rule that, at “an irreducible minimum,” the constitutional requisites under Article III for the existence of standing are that the plaintiff must personally have: 1) suffered some actual or threatened injury; 2) that injury can fairly be traced to the challenged action of the defendant; and 3) that the injury is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.”
https://constitution.findlaw.com/article3/annotation10.html
“the constitutional requisites under Article III for the existence of standing are that the plaintiff must personally have: 1) suffered some actual or threatened injury; 2) that injury can fairly be traced to the challenged action of the defendant; and 3) that the injury is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.”
#########################
Sad. By this definition, in the instance of abortion, whether chemical or surgical, the only one who inarguably suffers injury is the aborted baby. So no one has “standing” in the case of abortion.
So, the only practical way to stop abortion through the courts is to have the court find that abortion is murder, which of course it is.