Posted on 06/11/2024 10:54:39 AM PDT by SJackson
Hamas are the civilians.
Americans expected Osama bin Laden to be found in a cave in Afghanistan. In reality, he was living comfortably in a military town in Pakistan under the protection of local authorities. Similarly, Israeli hostages, including the four who were last rescued, have come home telling stories of being kept captive in ‘civilian’ households.
In both cases we fundamentally misunderstood what Islamic terrorism is. It’s not a “fringe group of extremists”, as politicians and the media describe it, but an ethnic and religious movement. The religious values of Islamic terrorists are universally shared by the vast majority of Muslims, while the ethnic ones ground Islamic warfare in the interests of specific clans and families.
Hamas is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood and has a widespread base of support across the Muslim world which is dotted with branches of the Brotherhood, but its ethnic power base is also grounded in the key clans and families that control Gaza. That is why Hamas still retains the support of the majority of the Muslim colonists currently occupying Gaza. It’s also why those same ‘civilians’ held Israeli hostages prisoner and could be trusted not to inform on them.
The latest Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research poll shows that 71% of Gazans support the Hamas atrocities of Oct 7 and 56% expect Hamas to win the war. 62% in Gaza are happy with the performance of Hamas during the war and 59% want Hamas to stay in power.
That’s because they are Hamas and the terror group is also them.
The ‘Palestinian’ myth is that the Muslim colonists occupying parts of Israel are the ‘indigenous’ people. The reality is that they were Arab settlers who arrived with and after the Islamic conquest of Israel. Some, like the notorious Husayini clan, which produced Hitler’s Mufti, were relatively recent arrivals. The most powerful and wealthiest of these large families took control of urban areas, as the Husayinis tried to do in Jerusalem, and became a vital part of the Ottoman feudal order serving as mayors and muftis. When the Ottomans were defeated, the clans fought to reclaim their power with movements like the Muslim Brotherhood also known as Hamas.
Hamas is an ideological Islamist movement, but its control over Gaza depends on these large families. That’s why the idea that most people have that Hamas is a fanatical movement that exists apart from ordinary people and can be fought and defeated apart from them is wrong.
That’s also why so few of the hostages have been rescued. Like the last four, the hostages were largely dispersed among ‘civilian’ clan families across neighborhoods controlled by them. These families are formally civilian households, but many of their members are affiliated with Hamas. Rather than being an army whose members belong foremost to Hamas, they are more like the mafia and belong foremost to their extended clan, and choose to lend their support to Hamas.
It’s not just that Hamas uses human shields, which it certainly does, it’s that its infrastructure depends on clans whose adults provide fighters and whose women and children act as human shields for the greater glory of the clan and for Islam. The same clans that will kill teenage girls for violating family honor will also serve up even younger children as human shields for honor.
There is no way for Israel to rescue its hostages without going into dense neighborhoods under the control of the clans to get them out. And that will lead to firefights and ‘Black Hawk Down’ moments. Clan members, who never identify themselves as such, will cry that they were massacred. And foreign leaders and the media will condemn the deaths of ‘civilians’.
Defeating Hamas without civilian casualties is impossible because the Islamic terrorist group not only operates among civilians, but is rooted in the society of Gaza. The clans that run Gaza, that provide the manpower that controls UNRWA institutions, and that are the mainstays of Hamas are also the large families that dominate the businesses, cultural and religious life in Gaza.
There’s no meaningful distinction between civilians and Hamas. Some clans reject Hamas authority and Israel has tried to solicit some of them to run Gaza. For now with few results. The United States strategy in Afghanistan and Iraq had similarly depended on swaying certain clans, elders and warlords into abandoning Al Qaeda or the Taliban with very temporary success.
Eventually the Taliban or Al Qaeda, rebranded as ISIS, returned. And some of the same men we had armed and trained, turned their guns on us. That is an almost inevitable outcome in Counterinsurgency or COIN. When bringing democracy to the Muslim world fails, Westerners begin competing with Jihadists for the support of the clans only to be stabbed in the back.
The Jihadists have the Koran on their side. To Muslims, their terrorism will always be more righteous than our fumbling efforts to avoid civilian casualties and collateral damage. Appealing to moderates or promising a better life will not win their support. On the contrary, it only infuriates the Imams in their mosques and the influential clan leaders into opposing us.
Instead we must reckon with the reality that there are few civilians in Gaza or in the Muslim world. And those who legitimately are civilians should be measured by their deeds, not their clothing. In a culture where terrorists in the field don’t wear uniforms, where large families have sizable stocks of weapons and children are taught to kill and die, the externals don’t matter.
There are no civilians in Gaza. The vast majority of the population supports Hamas or some Islamic terrorist movement. Only a tiny minority opposes Islamic terrorism and wants peace.
The distinction is not between soldiers, terrorists and civilians, but enemies and non-combatants. Israel and Western nations should stop thinking about civilians, a concept that does not apply in a battlespace where terrorists wear street clothes and entire neighborhoods are controlled by clans that hide hostages in plain sight, and think about enemies and neutrals.
An enemy is anyone, regardless of clothing or sex, who is aligned with Islamic terrorists.
Every poll continues to show that the vast majority of those in Gaza are aligned with the enemy. And if that were not the case, the war would have long since ended once locals informed the authorities of where the hostages are and where the remaining Hamas terrorists are set up.
Israel is not just at war with an organization, but with an enemy culture. As is most of the world whether it chooses to admit it or not. The war is not defined by what they wear, but what they think. As long as human shields, female suicide bombers and child soldiers abound, the war cannot be fought by treating civilians as noncombatants while hunting elusive terrorists.
The only way to defeat an enemy is to fight him as he is, not as we would like him to be.
It would be a far cleaner and neater war if Islamic terrorists fought like conventional armies. They do not. And it is time to fight them on their own terms instead.
Hamas can’t be defeated by waiting until its terrorists take off their civilian clothes and put on uniforms. Hamas are the civilians. They are the ones holding the hostages. The only way to free the hostages and defeat the terrorists is to destroy the terror culture in whatever form it takes.
You just keep telling yourself that.
I just love the little weasel words..."Deliberate killing of babies".... hey, ask yourself this. If you let off a couple of 1000lb bombs in a city....even "precision" bombs... you think that unless the pilot says, "oh yeah, I can see the little tyke right there....let 'em go".... or is it that so he can justify and cleanse his conscious by saying "well who knew if little babies or children or innocent people are near my munitions".... probably didn't hit them anyway.... and if I did, it was an accident... but was it? Was it really? Go look at what large munitions do to cities pal. They can drop concrete bombs that kill occupants with air pressure and not the blast... the insides are goo but the outsides aren't sprayed all over the walls and street.
Let loose with a .50, or .240 and just MAYBE a stray round kicks around and just happens to kill a child.... accident, random but if you let loose with that weapon in a city, it's gotta go somewhere, right?
You are under the illusion of neat, precision, righteous, well intentioned war.... It's not that way and will never be that way. Do you think that Sherman knew he'd starve little rebel babies when he decided to burn everything as he led some 60,000 soldiers on a long march from Atlanta to Savannah, Georgia. The purpose of Sherman's March to the Sea was to frighten Georgia's civilian population into abandoning the Confederate cause
Finally when dealing with insurgencies, they are the most personal and the killing is done with that up close personal method that gives nightmares to witnesses and participants.
I won't even prejudice you with any recommendations of counter insurgency and insurgency manuals, books or studies.... look up how they were won and what it took.
I love the little "you belong with the terrorists". ... Guess what my friend, if you or your country killed my family, I'd spend every waking hour of the rest of my life getting payback. In the exact manner and loss that I suffered.
That's why insurgencies are so tough to fight. But since there are rules that you think happen in the field, then please direct me to the book that explicitly explains how to not kill children when making war in urban environments. I will admit that I've read some books on the subject and they are agnostic on the quantity and methods that civilians are to be intimidated in order to fully combat insurgents and win the long conflict.
I’ve been saying this since October 7.
L
There are no civilians in Gaza. The vast majority of the population supports Hamas or some Islamic terrorist movement. Only a tiny minority opposes Islamic terrorism and wants peace.
Ping out to the Daniel Greenfield Ping! List.
As always, please FReepmail me if you want on or off the esteemed Daniel Greenfield ping list.
Daniel Greenfield's website: The Sultan Knish blog
There are NO moderate Arab Muhammadans, period. There are only the radicals, and their enablers.
Excellent article. Daniel Greenfield is always a good read.
That book was, of course, biased, I‘d wager. But are propaganda writings not supposed to be? Propaganda has to be simple and full of half-truths. Facts are not important. Unlike other wars, it continued unabated after the cessation of hostilities.
Imagine if „Zhang Fei“, who most probably was raised on a diet of such and similar works (hacks like Rex Stout and the other blood- guzzlers of the so called Writers‘ war board come to mind) - not to mention the hellfire on nitrocellulose which was churned out by Hollywood, so dreadful they make even Nazi and Soviet propaganda film look relatively harmless by comparison - had a say in America‘s foreign policy…
But, as it turned out, there was sharp criticism of these propaganda works, too. America was, after all, far more moral than her opponents.
Still, Nietzsche‘s famous dictum proved true once more: „When you gaze into the abyss for too long, the abyss will eventually gaze back at you“.
All the best for you😀
exactly......
It helps to actually pay attention - it’s the group that says they’re all “innocent civilians” that wants to bring them here....
The same group saying "They're all terrorists. They're all animals." is also saying "Let's send them to the United States."
They'll make it appear as though two different groups are making statements but behind the curtain, it's the same handlers paying both halves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.