[E. Pluribus Unum]

“Gender” is a grammatical term. There actually are three genders; masculine, feminine and neutral. Neutral gender is when something is neither masculine or feminine gender.

“Sex” is a biological term. There are two sexes; male and female.

[HIDEK6]

It should have said, “Only two sexes.”

Educated men know the difference between sex and gender.

[Buttons12]

Best thing that could happen to him personally. A slap on the fanny of a newborn conservative.

[ridesthemiles]

HILLSDALE CANNOT BUILD SCHOOLS FAST ENOUGH

[The Westerner]

What kind of unprincipled thought asserts a person’s feelings negate the individual’s Right to express a thought? With our schools destroying the child’s ability to think in principles before the age of 14, there will be no citizens left to defend the Individual Rights upon which this country is founded. Just a mob of hurt feelings trumping other hurts feelings. Mob rule here we come.

[Political Junkie Too]

the words might make some students feel

How about how the concepts make Liam feel?

"There are FIVE genders!!!"

-PJ

[cableguymn]

how many kids did they kick out for wearing a pride shirt? 0?

huh. seems a little strange doesn’t it?

[Ciaphas Cain]

I thought the Tinker decision had already long ago settled this kind of thing.

Gonna be interesting to see how it plays out with the Supreme Court.

[kiryandil]

LOL!

If Cankles had won in 2016, this is what was coming for ALL of us.

Four "judges" - 3 Obama stooges and a Biden stooge.

APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Indira Talwani, U.S. District Obama stooge]

goes to the First Circuit Court of Appeals.

Before
David Barron, Chief Obama Stooge, O. Rogeriee Thompson, Obama stooge and Lara Montecalvo, Biden stooge. First Circuit ruling:

https://adfmedialegalfiles.blob.core.windows.net/files/LM-AppellateRuling.pdf

[T.B. Yoits]

The kid needs to go in shirtless with XX ≠ XY written on his chest.

No shirt to for anyone to find "offensive".

[Amendment10]

Thank you for referencing that article lowbridge.

"“This case is about much more than a t-shirt,” a lawyer for the Massachusetts Family Institute said in response to the appeals court ruling. “The court’s decision is not only a threat to the free speech rights of public school students across the country, but a threat to basic biological truths.”"

---

Based on what institutionally indoctrinated, misguided (imo) judges have so far decided on this issue, the law schools are evidently not teaching students the Supreme Court's clarification about biological birth sex recognized in Minor v. Happersett, women in Virginia Minor's state not allowed to vote (19th century).

After all, the Supreme Court did not recommend that Virginia Minor simply claim to be a man in order to vote.

Note that Virginia Minor's fight for women's suffrage supported the ratification of the sex-related 19th Amendment voting rights protection.

"19th Amendment: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."

[Trumpisourlastchance]

So the First and Fourth Amendments are now gone. Second will be next.