Posted on 06/09/2024 1:18:44 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Rebecca must have stopped taking her meds. 🙄🙄🙄
Plants will be happy but my allergies may not. More active plants means more aggressive growth.
OMG, now I know why we don’t need more CO2, the triffids are coming!!!🙄
You are saying temperature is cyclical??? Blasphemy!!! /s
“ Stop. Please make it stop.”
Why do you keep posting it, then?
So do your part & plant a tree trees provide shade & absorb CO2😁
“than ever” is a very short time. Than ever is defined as less than a hundred year. We have a 4+ billion year old planet. We have had far more CO2 and far less. We have had a far warmer planet and a far colder planet. We are not at an extreme. And our planet is constantly moving from one extreme to another for a host of reasons. Climate is just a scam to sell carbon tokens. Most of the world is not buying it. And we should not either.
BTW, I was wondering if they mean there is not enough plant life to suck up all the co2 in the atmosphere and by putting more into the air we have more co2 than the plant life can absorb. But if the existing ppm is 450-500 and I was told the plants are starving. Should more co2 be good for plants there by not starving them and allowing them to thrive better. So is there a growth lag that is not being accounted for yet?
BTW, I was wondering if they mean there is not enough plant life to suck up all the co2 in the atmosphere and by putting more into the air we have more co2 than the plant life can absorb. But if the existing ppm is 450-500 and I was told the plants are starving. Should more co2 be good for plants there by not starving them and allowing them to thrive better. So is there a growth lag that is not being accounted for yet?
The early Permian period, carbon based life including plants, nearly ALL went extinct. Lowering the CO2 level in the atmosphere is bad Bad BAD.
“There is more CO2 in the atmosphere than ever” That sounds like a Jr high child wrote that.
That would be .0042
No, it is not at its highest concentrations ever.
This is an abject lie
No!
Cut down vast swathes of trees and replace them with solar panels.
That lowers CO2 \emissions\, right?
I blame it on bringing millions from 3rd world levels of CO2 emissions up to 1st world levels by importing them in droves.
As determined from ICE cores.
Cold water sequesters CO2.
Plus those ICE cores are localized to the [current] poles or very high elevations (where the air is thinner.
The largest CULT in human history.
Hurray for global warming. Hurray for carbon dioxide. I burp as often as I can to do my part.
“Than ever?” How would they know?
Hunga Tonga mega-eruption effects are still being felt after 2 years.
More lies from NPR. The only people who listen to it are those who are totally brainwashed leftists anyway.
Present CO2 concentration is 400- 420 ppm.
"During the Paleozoic Era, CO2 levels were as high as 4,000 parts per million (ppm) around 300 million years ago. During the Ordovician Period, around 500 million years ago, CO2 levels were around 3,000-9,000 ppm."
Because...science.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.