[E. Pluribus Unum]

The New York Times is not a legitimate news source. Its articles are presented for entertainment purposes only.

And they ARE entertaining!

[dforest]

That Brenda gal is drinking too much of that apple wine.

[Paladin2]

NYT continues with its “no holodomor to see here” cover for real fascists and dictators.

[Who is John Galt?]

[Liz]

Looks like lots of people get the left's message.

President Trump in Arizona last Thursday.

[Ken522]

President Trump IS ... the victim of an administration that has to play dirty to eliminate a rival as formidable as he...

There, fixed it ...

[stanne]

Em… no spin. That’s the situation.

[odawg]

“When a Manhattan jury found Donald J. Trump guilty, it should have sent shock waves through the nation. Yet, though the trial and conviction of a former president was unprecedented in American history, it seems most people couldn’t have cared less.”

How do you like that? The second sentence completely contradicts the first.

[clashfan]

Whineapple has scales over her eyes.

[Billthedrill]

In its way, that must have annoyed Mr. Trump

Oh, my no, Brenda. The only ones who were annoyed are the idiots at places like the NYT who found out that their slander campaign was a bust. That must have been annoying.

[cuz1961]

brenda

a dems drama mama

pfft.

pure
projection

[clearcarbon]

"The New York Times is not a legitimate news source. Its articles are presented for entertainment purposes only."

[kiryandil]

Who is this “Brenda Wineapple” front hole?

[bigbob]

With a name like Brenda Wineapple...

[SaxxonWoods]

Yes, NYT, he gets to do that. You’ve been spinning your tales for decades with no interference.

[LegendHasIt]

New York Times: May the bearings of their printing presses seize, and the server of their website crash beyond repair.

[sopo]

This is worth publishing?

[dodger]

Wait! Wait! Her own website declaims ...

“Brenda Wineapple, a superb literary critic, has a historian’s soul”!

[rwa265]

There were many things in this trial that was unprecedented. The jury members not only did not have to agree on the underlying crime, they did not even have to state what they thought the underlying crime was. Trump was guilty because orange man bad.

[Petrosius]

A felony conviction for a … bookkeeping entry!? The Democrats are grasping at straws. They must be really afraid.

[rktman]

And? The (b)administration does indeed play dirty. Broken clock effect?