Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Multiple legal experts have cited multiple legal reasons why Trump’s guilty verdict is likely to be overturned on appeal.
Wordpress ^ | June 2, 2024 | Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

Posted on 06/02/2024 8:55:34 AM PDT by grundle

Multiple legal experts have cited multiple legal reasons why Trump’s guilty verdict is likely to be overturned on appeal.

I am listing some of their reasons here, but there are a lot more reasons at the links:

Judges are supposed to be chosen at random. But this judge was selected on purpose.

Judges aren’t supposed to make political donations. But this judge had donated to multiple anti-trump organizations.

The main crime that Trump was convicted of was a misdemeanor, and the statute of limitations had expired. However, the prosecutor updated it to a felony, and used some other crime to avoid the statute of limitations. However, the prosecutor never said what that other crime was. The judge gave the jury instructions that they did not have to vote unanimously when it came to this other crime. The judge gave the jury three separate crimes to choose from, and said they could split their vote, such as, for example, by 4-4-4.

The campaign finance law that Trump was convicted of breaking is a federal law, not a state law. The state has no jurisdiction in this matter.

Here are opinion columns from three different legal experts that explain why there are multiple legal reasons why the verdict is likely to be overturned on appeal:

Alan Dershowitz: “I was inside the court when the judge closed the Trump trial, and what I saw shocked me”

https://nypost.com/2024/05/21/opinion/i-was-inside-the-court-when-the-judge-closed-the-trump-trial-and-what-i-saw-shocked-me/

Jonathan Turley: “Bragg’s thrill kill in Manhattan could prove short-lived on appeal”

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4697118-braggs-thrill-kill-in-manhattan-could-prove-short-lived-on-appeal/

Elie Honig: “Prosecutors Got Trump — But They Contorted the Law”

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-was-convicted-but-prosecutors-contorted-the-law.html


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hushmoneytrial; marxisttyranny; persecution; trump; trumpconviction; trumppersecution; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 06/02/2024 8:55:34 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle
Of course legally it should be overturned on appeal.
But then again, legally it shouldn't have been a case in the first place.

Are the same forces in charge of the appellate court?

2 posted on 06/02/2024 9:00:40 AM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

When?


3 posted on 06/02/2024 9:01:39 AM PDT by OKSooner (Divest from New York.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

2032.


4 posted on 06/02/2024 9:02:11 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Appellate court is in NY, populated by “judges” appointed by Democrats. My guess is the appeal goes no where.

Best bet is if somehow they can get the SCOTUS to take the case, which I think is unlikely.


5 posted on 06/02/2024 9:02:35 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Of course its going to be overturned 🙄

My prediction is that the judge will likely try to actually send Trump to jail. The Trump attorneys will introduce a writ for emergency hearing to the SCOTUS. The SCOTUS will put the kibosh on the incarceration while they deliberate and then rule to overturn the conviction. I do not expect this to go through the appellate court.


6 posted on 06/02/2024 9:03:43 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
The same legal experts were the ones that said Bragg never had a case to begin with, yet here we are.

Their legal opinions are based on the law, and the prosecution, judge, and jury were politically biased.

And will the appeal judges in NY be any different?

And once again, SCOTUS is in no hurry to right these wrongs.

7 posted on 06/02/2024 9:03:59 AM PDT by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Doesn't matter if it is overturned because the rabid progs got what they wanted -- the "Trump is a convicted felon" headline and talking point.
8 posted on 06/02/2024 9:04:13 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“When exposing a crime is treated like a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Edward Snowden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Yes, the appeals court has already looked at these things and let the “trial” move forward. It’s unlikely that they will suddenly change gears and overturn a conviction. This is why it’s important that SCOTUS step in and put a stop to this travesty.


9 posted on 06/02/2024 9:06:51 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

If the case doesn’t leave the state of NY, Trump is getting locked up, whether in prison or under house arrest. No court in that state is going to overrule the kangaroo court.


10 posted on 06/02/2024 9:08:44 AM PDT by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

where will it be overturned? Judges in NY make up rules just to persecute people they don’t like- They changed the rule for time limits just so they could go after Trump, then they told jurors that they need not all agree on all the charges, but only on a few, and that would make him guilty on all counts- or some such nonsense-

Trump can’t win in courts that refuse to look at the evidence, and judge objectively- courts where they continually move the goal posts to protect themselves while making it impossible for Trump to win- They set out to persecute and prosecute- and laws and facts didn’t matter- I can’t see where he woudl get a fair appeal trial-


11 posted on 06/02/2024 9:08:59 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

I completely agree. They want Trump in prison garb for the commercials.


12 posted on 06/02/2024 9:11:03 AM PDT by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HandBasketHell

and therein is the problem.

Even if R’s are willing to fight, which is questionable to begin with, they insist on playing by the rules. Even Trump has said we’re the party of law and order. The Democrats make up the “rules” as they go.


13 posted on 06/02/2024 9:11:24 AM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

AFTER the election


14 posted on 06/02/2024 9:11:38 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jonny7797

Evil always triumphs, because good is dumb.


15 posted on 06/02/2024 9:12:23 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HandBasketHell

I’ll tell you something that’s probably going to be very unpopular......anybody that thinks that judge won’t physically put Trump in jail better wake up because that IS going to happen....not might, WILL.....I guarantee it.


16 posted on 06/02/2024 9:13:53 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salman

The Appellate court consists of 5 black women. They probably won’t hear the case, either way he loses.


17 posted on 06/02/2024 9:14:50 AM PDT by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

A kangaroo court in full open public view uncaring that they are seen as the usurpers that they are “ convicted “ Trump and none dared challenge them and Trump and everyone else is acting like the “court” is respect worthy and possessed of it full legitimate power. So WHY should any other court gain say them? They won’t.


18 posted on 06/02/2024 9:15:50 AM PDT by TalBlack (I We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

I agree.


19 posted on 06/02/2024 9:18:18 AM PDT by Calvin Cooledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

Someone in the Trump organization or in a law firm who represents Trump was paid off by Soros to develop and exploit Trump’s business practices against himself.
The two attorneys on the jury may have been paid off by Soros to become the jury foreman and press for a guilty verdict. Its surprising Trump’s attorneys allowed attorneys to be on the jury. The defense was asking for a guilty verdict.


20 posted on 06/02/2024 9:19:38 AM PDT by chopperk (are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson