Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The judge who presided over Donald Trump’s fraud case closed off many avenues of appeal
New York Times on X ^

Posted on 06/01/2024 11:53:32 AM PDT by janetjanet998

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: janetjanet998

Every time the judge sustains an objection by the prosecution it sets up an avenue of appeal. Everytime a judge disallows testimony by a defense witness it sets up an avenue of appeal. Every time a judge issuea erroneous jury instructions it sets up an avenue of appeal. Every time a prosecution witness is allowed to testify as to irrelevant matters that are more prejudicial than probative, it sets up an avenue of appeal.

The state court had no jurisdiction over alleged federal crimes. Jurisdiction is always an avenue of appeal.

The question is, what avenue of appeal is not open in this case?


21 posted on 06/01/2024 12:23:12 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Do the math. L+G+B+T+Q = 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
Trump has a right of appeal from a final judgment. Always.

This trial was filled with legal errors and direct palpable violations of rights. Dirshowitz has commented on this and suggested Trump should not waste his time on the intermediate level Court of Apeals which will be a waste of time as it has already been and instea go directly to the COA for the State. The Judge cannot somehow wall off appeal on his violations of the US Constitution or his exceeing his jurisdiction [e..g blowing right by the statute of limitations; and, trying a federal crime in his state court]. This article must be garbage.

22 posted on 06/01/2024 12:24:05 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Don’t you mean “Proud justice involved person”?


23 posted on 06/01/2024 12:24:27 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
I can't read the article and really don't want too.

I am curious how the so-called judge has done something to strip President Trump of this rights to appeal.

This sounds to me like the Times is peddling hope to Dimocrats and discouragement to Republicans.

Perhaps the Times has private assurances that the Supreme Court has agreed to participate in the scam.

24 posted on 06/01/2024 12:24:31 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

In my humble opinion, the Trump team should go on offense. The judge is part of a conspiracy to violate the federal civil rights of Trump and of American voters.


25 posted on 06/01/2024 12:24:55 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Every time the judge overules and objection or makes clear taht no more objections will be tolerated he sets himself up for appeal. Every legal determination that prejudices the case is subject to appeal.


26 posted on 06/01/2024 12:25:33 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

I know you posted this because we would all like to know what he did and maybe someone would know. But seriously, who here is gonna be subscribed to the NYT?


27 posted on 06/01/2024 12:26:15 PM PDT by sunny bonobo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: convoter2016

Nor do I.


28 posted on 06/01/2024 12:26:25 PM PDT by bigfootbob (Arm Up and Live Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: convoter2016
Actually I don’t believe it. Closing off many avenues of appeal seems to suggest to judge bent over backwards to let the defense have its way but I sense the judge made many motions that benefited the prosecution, not the defense. For example, Trump’s lawyer wanted a change in venue but the judge denied that motion.

You must remember, the article cited legal "experts". How can you compete with that?

29 posted on 06/01/2024 12:27:03 PM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: laplata

“I hope that doesn’t include the Supreme Court.”

Indeed not. It should get to the Supreme court only after the end of his second term by when he should have a trunkful of severed heads ready to be mounted.


30 posted on 06/01/2024 12:27:28 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
President Donald Trump news from the New York Times?


31 posted on 06/01/2024 12:27:51 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunny bonobo; janetjanet998

Very valid point, please take heed Janet.


32 posted on 06/01/2024 12:29:25 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

How likely is it that Trumps New York Trial judge, has a daughter who is president of a Chicago company that is on the payroll of Adam Schiff and making millions of dollars?


33 posted on 06/01/2024 12:30:13 PM PDT by aklurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Did he “turn off” due process?


34 posted on 06/01/2024 12:30:28 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Not advising the defendent of the charges against him is an avenue of appeal. Not allowing him to confront witnesses is an avenue of appeal. Not allowing him to answer to the charges communicated in closing argument is an avenue of appeal.


35 posted on 06/01/2024 12:30:49 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

You mean like when he instructed the jury that they need not agree upon which crimes he committed, that it was enough that they each thought he was guilty of something?


36 posted on 06/01/2024 12:32:02 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I don’t either. Its the NY Times making excuses for future corrupt rulings by the NYS appellate courts.”

True but therein is the real problem now. The series of hostile appeals courts awaiting Trump. We are looking at the initial polls and contributions but they may giving us optimism that ignores the reality. If Trump has lost one or two appeals by Election day which seems likely l have doubts he will still have a cheat proof lead. It may be time for him to consider getting behind a revenge replacement because if Traitor Joe gets another term our country is truly finished.


37 posted on 06/01/2024 12:33:13 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Thank you. Some have totally written off the Constitution but it was written for redress of unjust causes. Regardless of the ‘experts’ saying all appeals have been written off, they are wrong.


38 posted on 06/01/2024 12:35:15 PM PDT by Judge Bean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998; All
Behind paywall

You can usually read the entire article if you toggle to text by clicking on this icon in the URL bar: .

It works for this article.


39 posted on 06/01/2024 12:35:30 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Nikki????.....Is that you???


40 posted on 06/01/2024 12:35:37 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson