Posted on 05/31/2024 2:44:36 PM PDT by Jane Long
You’re very welcome, dear Jane.
As I wrote to Lakeside Granny, you’d think there is ample evidence of corruption for Judge Cannon to toss this case.
Maybe, we have to let it play out as Julie Kelly explainsš¤
Also, SCOTUS may be dragging out opinions into next weekā¹
I loved that good news poll.
We absolutely have to keep the House and getting a comfortable majority would be the nail in the coffin for the demonrats.
I think Trump will have no trouble bringing up and focusing on the issues that matter even if the biased moderators don’t.
Good morning, sweetie!
I’m with you, so much more going on to talk about.
Don’t need to see this so I cleaned a bathroom
I can’t wait for Pres Trump to blast the debate with topics We the People are concerned about and FED UP over!
I know they’ll try to mute him, but...that will only fire folks up, even more.
Ugh ... saw that, too, sweetie.
CLICK! šš¼
Of ALL the things/guests to have, with SO much going on, now.
Do you have a bathroom to clean? LOL
Good grief, Lunden Roberts is still on.
I’m leaving it on because Mike Davis and Julie Kelly are going to report on the SC decisions that come out today.
I’m doing laundry now.š
At least it’s giving me time to get something done.
The 6-3 SCOTUS ruling backing the Biden Administrationās coercion of social media companies effectively means the government can censor Americansā constitutionally protected speech so long as they outsource it to a third party. Unbelievable. Alitoās dissent is spot on. pic.twitter.com/7SVUcwLoJmā Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 26, 2024
Anytime an American citizen has their constitutionally protected free speech curtailed or censored by their government, the injuring is obvious, therefore they have standing.ā Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 26, 2024
Yes. I agree, of course, with the dissent by Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch. However, I just want to make sure people know the case is not completely dead.ā JKash šMAGA Queen (@JKash000) June 26, 2024
NEW: Jonathan Turley shreds the Supreme Court’s decision to allow the U.S. government to demand the removal of ‘misinformation’ on social media.
The Supreme Court ruled that the governmentās communications with social media giants about removing Covid-19 “misinformation” did *not* violate the First Amendment.
“This is one of the most fundamental issues that we are facing.”
“It’s been called Orwellian by lower court judges. And what the court is saying is that we won’t hear you on this issue ‘cause you’re not the right litigants.”
“I testified about this in Congress, that they have made a mockery of the limits of the First Amendment by doing indirectly what they’re barred from doing directly.”
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1805981591841411477
Barrett really messed up on this decision, right?
š”
I worked on organizing kitchen drawers ... š
One of the comments.....
Iām not happy with this ruling. They said what the government did wasnāt causal and the plaintiffs didnāt show injury if I read it correctly. Iām curious if the lawsuit was written too broadly.ā SaltyGoat (@SaltyGoat17) June 26, 2024
Another.......
My wife brought up a good point on this. Elon pays a lot of creators on X now so if they try this and people get suspended they will definitely be able to show injury in a lawsuit.ā SaltyGoat (@SaltyGoat17) June 26, 2024
DC_Draino
@DC_Draino
There is a lot of doom and gloom about the 6-3 SCOTUS decision in Murthy v. Biden and how it impacts the 1st Amendment
I would like to quell some of those concerns
This decision reversed the injunction based on *standing*
SCOTUS said that without the plaintiffs having sufficient standing, they could not decide the case on the merits
The case is still allowed to proceed *on the merits* in lower federal courts as to whether the govāt violated the plaintiffās 1st Amendment right to free speech on social media
Long story short, this battle for free speech rights is NOT over and SCOTUS will likely get further involved down the road
7:45 AM Ā· Jun 26, 2024
https://x.com/DC_Draino/status/1805975734055321917
Thanks ... appreciate the reassurance, on this ruling.
Sure hoping DC/Rogan, Kash, et al, are right on.
Just became aware that today’s barbershop round table is a SURROGATE ONLY event, meaning NO RPOTUSā¹š¢
Bummer :-(
Good that the Trump campaign is holding this roundtable, though.
Thx, Edie!!
Thanks for keeping this thread going.
Thank you for that info on the barbershop round table, edie.
I wonder who will be leading it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.