The 6-3 SCOTUS ruling backing the Biden Administration’s coercion of social media companies effectively means the government can censor Americans’ constitutionally protected speech so long as they outsource it to a third party. Unbelievable. Alito’s dissent is spot on. pic.twitter.com/7SVUcwLoJm— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 26, 2024
Anytime an American citizen has their constitutionally protected free speech curtailed or censored by their government, the injuring is obvious, therefore they have standing.— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 26, 2024
Yes. I agree, of course, with the dissent by Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch. However, I just want to make sure people know the case is not completely dead.— JKash 🍊MAGA Queen (@JKash000) June 26, 2024
NEW: Jonathan Turley shreds the Supreme Court’s decision to allow the U.S. government to demand the removal of ‘misinformation’ on social media.
The Supreme Court ruled that the government’s communications with social media giants about removing Covid-19 “misinformation” did *not* violate the First Amendment.
“This is one of the most fundamental issues that we are facing.”
“It’s been called Orwellian by lower court judges. And what the court is saying is that we won’t hear you on this issue ‘cause you’re not the right litigants.”
“I testified about this in Congress, that they have made a mockery of the limits of the First Amendment by doing indirectly what they’re barred from doing directly.”
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1805981591841411477
Barrett really messed up on this decision, right?
😡