To: nickcarraway
Some states allow it, but it will be so obviously a corrupt move here.
10 posted on
05/29/2024 7:33:56 PM PDT by
vladimir998
( Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: vladimir998
Some states allow it, but it will be so obviously a corrupt move here.Do you think they care?
Everything in this trial has been obviously corrupt. What's one more little issue?
18 posted on
05/29/2024 7:38:30 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
("First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: vladimir998
Even if alternates are available, there has to be a “valid” reason to remove the juror.
It can’t just be that they disagree with the others. Maybe if they were crazy and refused to talk to the other jurors.
In any event, removing a juror who would acquit would be the icing on this corrupt cake.
25 posted on
05/29/2024 7:42:01 PM PDT by
Williams
(Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
To: vladimir998
The Supreme Court is going to blow a hole big enough to drive a bus through when this scam trial is all over.
Everything about this trial and how it was handled was against the Constitution and Trumps right to a fair trial.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson