[Political Junkie Too]

There's not a lot of positive news from that market analysis.

1. Rubio is a non-starter. He's from Florida too, and we need the Senate seat (even if Rubio's seat is safe, why force another unnecessary special election).

2. Haley won't be in the inner circle. There may be a place for her in Trump's government, but it won't be in a trusted position. She's too liked by the Deep State to let her be too close to the action.

3. Ramaswamy has a place in the administration, but not VP. NBC issues; too many other qualified people with two citizen parents to risk going there. Give him something like Commerce.

4. Carson is well-liked but too passive a personality. Not VP material. I'd trust him with my baby's brain surgery, but not against Schumer and Pelosi. You don't bring a scalpel to a knife fight. Put him back in HHS or Surgeon General.

5. Scott. See Carson. He's better suited to the Senate.

6. Vance, Stefanik, Huckabee -- not ripe yet.

My opinion? I've suggested Abbott in Texas for immigration and states rights, or Glenn Youngkin in Virginia for education and parents rights. If Trump must choose a woman, then perhaps Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee (risking the Senate seat); she's a vocal fighter, too.

-PJ

[Sacajaweau]

Lee Zeldin.....Would explain NY visits.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

I am not recommending bets. People lose money gambling all the time. This just reflects what some people believe. Abbott has good qualities but I’m not sure he has the razor tongue of a debater. Of course Kamala can probably remember her lines better than Biden but that’s not saying much.

[Nachoman]

I see Trump picking Haley to shore up his base by bringing in her supporters.