[Eleutheria5]

Watergate? What Watergate?

[Noumenon]

Nuremberg II

[RandFan]

Rand says the DoJ should prosecute this and give Morens immunity in exchange for testimony about Fauci:

"I believe Anthony Fauci was in charge of the entire conspiracy."

Clip

[Red6]

Typical of today’s bureaucrats.

Criminal behavior.

No consequence.

Why do you think HRC was running her own server? If it could be derogatory or a potential issue in the future, do it through alternative communication channels where you have control of the information, have meetings on tarmacs, don’t do it in writing (keep it oral)... Of course use the classification system to hide it... And then when caught destroy the evidence and never face any repercussions.

[SaveFerris]

It’s a good thing I’m not a tinfoil conspiracy guy or I’d think there’s something suspicious going on for some time now.

Oh, at BTW, Nuremberg II. Now.

[roving]

His answer to a lot of everything was it was just dark humor.

[fella]

Sounds like the Hilery/teeny-boppereaqe style defense of “I don’t remember” and I don’t recall”. The Paul Shanklin song nails it.

[George J. Jetso]

Fauci should be on trial.

[maddog55]

And again NOTHING HAPPENS. It’s SOP for these committee investigations.

They could find several videos of someone under investigation for murder that show the actual murder being committed in front of of a 100 eye witnesses and the guy confesses and the he walks free... That’s the result of a congressional investigation.

[chopperk]

Indict David for numerous offenses.

[1Old Pro]

I watched part of that hearing, the guy is playing dumb, quite obvious. Lock him up.

[Carry_Okie]

Everybody keeps pretending that "deleting" actually happens.

When do we learn how to use that monster NSA server farm in Utah to recover these communications by voice or email? If it went to a gmail account, there is a record.

[RideForever]

Yesterday there was a thread about a CoVID murder trial when Ivermectin was prescribed to a CoVID patient who was intubated and dying. Patient started getting better. Then hospital denied further IVM treatment, and the patient returned to dying. After a mad scramble, a second prescription for IVM was presented and given to the patient, who started getting better again. Then the hospital stopped the IVM a second time, and the patient died. Judge correctly ruled that it was murder and the Fed law did not protect the hospital's actions.

So my question is, how did the hospital get the positive results from treating with IVM, TWICE, when Biden's CDC and NIH with all their 'knowledge' couldn't get it to be effective when they allegedly tested it?