Skip to comments.
Alvin Bragg's Office Deleted Phone Call Records Of Michael Cohen And Stormy Daniels' Lawyer
Epoch Times ^
| 05/12/2024
| Tom Ozimek
Posted on 05/12/2024 6:47:04 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: Paladin2
Only if the panda furries can’t make it.
21
posted on
05/13/2024 4:24:38 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
To: SeekAndFind
So the Prosecution gets to delete selected bits of evidence before the Defense or public sees it? Well, I am sure we can trust them to be fair...
22
posted on
05/13/2024 5:25:24 AM PDT
by
AndyTheBear
(Certified smarter than average for my species)
To: SharpRightTurn
23
posted on
05/13/2024 6:17:08 AM PDT
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: Political Junkie Too; GOPJ; DoughtyOne
The trial is NOT coming to an end, the prosecution is simply resting its case."Resting its case" without revealing the alleged "federal crime" that Bragg used to bump alleged misdemeanors to felonies?
To: SeekAndFind
Automatic MISTRIAL.
25
posted on
05/13/2024 6:43:15 AM PDT
by
Jane Long
(The role of the GOP: to write sharply-worded certailetters as America becomes a communist hell-hole.)
To: Jane Long
Automatic MISTRIAL. This isn't America anymore.
26
posted on
05/13/2024 6:47:08 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: SeekAndFind
Raising questions about evidentiary integrity.
The judge won’t do anything about it’s not in the trial script the WH sent.
27
posted on
05/13/2024 6:56:58 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: SeekAndFind
28
posted on
05/13/2024 7:17:59 AM PDT
by
DocRock
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
"Resting its case" without revealing the alleged "federal crime" that Bragg used to bump alleged misdemeanors to felonies? Shhhhhh... nobody's supposed to notice that...
That would be grounds for an immediate dismissal. If Bragg didn't reveal the crime in furtherance, then President Trump must have the presumption of innocence in such a crime.
-PJ
29
posted on
05/13/2024 7:54:58 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
It is against the law to intentionally destroy exculpatory evidence....isn't it.?
31
posted on
05/13/2024 9:44:47 AM PDT
by
unread
(I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the REPUBLIC..!)
To: Political Junkie Too
I don’t understand how any juror could vote to convict Trump. However, I know that in blue areas one hears a lot of lies about him, and the herd mentality is strong. Some wives threaten to make the home a living hell if the man doesn’t vote for Biden.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson