Is it true that Merchan wouldn’t allow them to bring up the issue of the 2 statements she signed saying the encounter never happened? That is the only relevant thing to ask her, after all.
Yes if I understand correctly. Reversable error right there.
The judge doesn’t want the jury to know about the letters that is certain. May prevent the letters being introduced in evidence. Because of course this whore’s role in this “book entry” crime is ...very 3rd party. It wasn’t hush money— it was money she and Cohen extorted by process (since Cohen was an attorney retained by Trump org), in their little arrangement. Clearly, Cohen was yet another humper of this washed out whore, and he paid her for the fun by shaking down the money and signing an NDA (which she then illegally did not honor— and thus is a full time LIAR).