I didn’t think the fact they had sex was even in doubt.
The defense could have stipulated that. I understand why they didn’t…but to suggest that fact was a big deal in this case is missing the entire point the prosecution is trying to make.
The prosecution just wants to talk about sex stuff. That’s pretty weak and sad.
Trump has always consistently denied that they had sex. Stormy has often denied it too, including in a sworn statement.
But wait. What about the people here who claim he is a germaphobe and would never touch a woman like her?
"Were you lieing then, Ms Clifford, or are you lieing, now?"
The crimes, here, are extortion, libel and slander, I would think.
You don’t have to object to everything.
Let the other side dig their own hole.
Reversible error.
Just like severely limiting what defense witnesses can testify to.
Activist Judiciary and get’s tossed or abandoned at some point.
She has denied it although when it benefited her
STORMY SIGN DOCUMENTS SAYING THEY NEVER HAD SEX...
WHICH IS IT?
EITHER WAY-—ISN’T SHE GUILTY OF PERJURY ?????
Trump has serious issues with germs. No reason to believe he would ever have sex with a porn star. It goes against common sense.