.
"You ain't seen nothing yet.. Give it another ten years and you'll swear your in South Africa..
Aliya.
I associate Jews with leftist Democrats. Until that changes, I won’t get too worked up about their ‘plight’.
People who vote for un-limiting government, get more absolutism and tyranny.
...you voted for it dude!
I am terrified that when I see many of the downfalls of society they are led by a Jew.
Now they are terrified.
i don’t know why you are terrified. The Political Party Jews have blindly and fanatically supported throughout the years is responsible for 98% of it, or more. Your prayers have been answered. You got what you prayed for. Why the crying?
The writer should look in the mirror.
Who Are the Semites? - Bernard E. Lewis
A historian traces the origins of the term. [EXCERPTS:]
Semites
As far back as 1704, the German philosopher and polymath Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz had identified a group of cognate languages which included Hebrew, old Punic, i.e., Carthaginian, Chaldaean, Syriac, and Ethiopic. To this group he gave the name "Arabic," after its most widely used and widely spoken member. To call a group by the name of one of its members could easily give to confusion, and Leibniz's nomenclature was not generally accepted.
It was not until 1781 that this group was given the name which it has retained ever since. In that year, August Ludwig Schlozer contributed an essay on this subject to a comprehensive German work on biblical and Oriental literature. According Schlozer, "from the Mediterranean Sea to the Euphrates and from Mesopotamia down to Arabia, as is known, only one language reigned. The Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews and Arabs were one people. Even the Phoenicians who were Hamites spoke this language, which I might call the Semitic." Schlozer goes on to discuss other languages of the area, and tries to fit them, not very successfully, into the framework provided by Genisis 10.
"Semitic" Languages
The idea that Semitic languages derived from one original language (by German philologists sometimes called Ursemitisch or proto-Semitic, and that the peoples speaking these languages were descended from one people, exercised considerable influence and caused some confusion.
By 1855, the French scholar Ernest Renan, one of the pioneers of Semitic philology, wrote complaining: "We can now see what an unhappy idea Eichhorn [sic; should be Schlozer apud Eichhorn] had when he gave the name of Semitic to the family of Syro-Arab languages. This name, which usage obliges us to retain, has been and will long remain the cause of a multitude of confusions.
"I repeat again that the name Semite here [Renan is referring to his pioneer study on Semitic philology] has only a purely conventional meaning: it designates the peoples who have spoken Hebrew, Syriac, Arabic or some neighboring dialect, and in no sense the people who are listed in the tenth chapter of Genesis as the descendants of Shem, who are, or at least half of them, of Aryan origin."
Renan was of course right in pointing to the dangers of taking "the generations of the sons of Noah" as a basis for philological classification. He might have gone further. The descendants of Ham, conventionally the ancestor of the Africans, include, in addition to Egypt and Ethiopia, Canaanites and Phoenicians, who lived in the Syro-Palestinian area and spoke a language very similar to Hebrew.
Defining Race
The confusion between race and language goes back a long way, and was compounded by the rapidly changing content of the word "race" in European and later in American usage. Serious scholars have pointed out — repeatedly and ineffectually — that "Semitic" is a linguistic and cultural classification, denoting certain languages and in some contexts the literatures and civilizations expressed in those languages.
As a kind of shorthand, it was sometimes retained to designate the speakers of those languages. At one time it might thus have had a connotation of race, when that word itself was used to designate national and cultural entities. It has nothing whatever to do with race in the anthropological sense that is now common usage. A glance at the present-day speakers of Arabic, from Khartoum to Aleppo and from Mauritania to Mosul, or even of Hebrew speakers in the modern state of Israel, will suffice to show the enormous diversity of racial types.
Time to wake up and reverse course at the speed of light.
Never understood their blind loyalty to the Democrat Party.
Never understood Dershowitz voting for Hillary and bragging about it after all she did. Never understood why he voted for Biden AFTER Trump's four years in office. I do not understand that type of blind loyalty.
Simple solution. Stop supporting and voting for Democrats.
The only thing the idiots proved was they they're well.. well.. idiots. And so are the college Presidents who allowed this traviesty to continue for days and weeks.
What really matters? That eighty percent of Americans support Israel. That's almost all of us deplorables and a lots of democrat citizens too. The Jews are NOT alone and we will defend them from democrat 'elites' in these hellhole colleges....
Maybe the author should leave NYC and move to where there are a lot of Baptists...
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Xlb6zoqkeG0
Above is a youtube “short” of Nixon answering a question on if professors should teach about marxism or communism.
He replies to the effect “Of course they should teach about it so the students learn about it. Where you need to draw the line though is when that professor is advocating for a foreign government over the United State’s position. Especially if they are in a military conflict with us.”