It’s really sad if Trump is limiting himself to these choices. I agree that Vance is better off where he is. But this time the VP needs to be an activist to push Trump to get rid of the Deep State. Vance is the only one of these four likely to do that.
I wish he’d think out of the box & look at Larry Elder, Ric Grenell or a few others. He could do much better than Scott if he wants to appeal to blacks, or some other victim group.
“But this time the VP needs to be an activist to push Trump to get rid of the Deep State. Vance is the only one of these four likely to do that.
I wish he’d think out of the box & look at Larry Elder, Ric Grenell or a few others. He could do much better than Scott if he wants to appeal to blacks, or some other victim group.”
Another good post. Burgum is anti-conservative and neither he, nor Scott nor Rubio are fighters. They’re all just different colors/flavors of milquetoast.
While one of these 3 may in fact be Trump’s pick, or more likely the GOPe’s pick who is foisted upon Trump (but hey — that trick worked very well in 1980!), the more likely scenario is that the far-leftists at Bloomberg have no idea whatsoever who is really on the short list, much less who the actual selection will be.
I’d seriously rather have Tulsi Gabbard as VP than some of these other options. And I really don’t trust Gabbard one bit despite her apparent move to the right over the past couple of years.
Byron Donalds