Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California court rules state laws cannot broadly override local government
thecentersquare.com ^ | The Center Square | Kenneth Schrupp

Posted on 04/30/2024 8:05:25 AM PDT by truthkeeper

A California court ruled state laws cannot broadly override local control over development and zoning, finding one of the state’s most significant new zoning laws is unconstitutional.

“This is not a case about whether or not our State Legislature may enact legislation to ensure access to affordable housing or whether it may act to address the different concern of a statewide housing shortage more generally,” wrote California Superior Court Judge Curtis A. Kin in his ruling. “However, because the provisions of SB 9 are not reasonably related and sufficiently narrowly tailored to the explicit stated purpose of that legislation — namely, to ensure access to affordable housing — SB 9 cannot stand.”

SB 9 required ministerial approval of both splitting of lots in areas zoned for single-family homes, and duplexes in areas zoned for single-family homes, thereby creating the ability to effectively buy a single-family home and split it into four units. Ministerial approval means the government must approve a project if it complies with applicable building requirements and fees have been paid.

(Excerpt) Read more at thecentersquare.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Finally, we get one.
1 posted on 04/30/2024 8:05:25 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

So, a city can legalize murder?


2 posted on 04/30/2024 8:12:17 AM PDT by fwdude ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
More information here...‘Duplex’ law allowing 4 homes on a lot struck down for California’s charter cities.
3 posted on 04/30/2024 8:13:56 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

There many good reaons to deride and seek changes in local zoning regulations, which local voters, not some state agency, can attend to, if they have a mind to.


4 posted on 04/30/2024 8:20:44 AM PDT by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

So preemption doesnt exist in CA? That means any community can set its own gun laws, concealed carry rules, etc. This would be bad precedent, in that case.


5 posted on 04/30/2024 8:21:00 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

Roger that .... then again, there’s that word “broadly” which neutralizes much of the ruling.


6 posted on 04/30/2024 8:22:44 AM PDT by glennaro (2024: The Year of The Reckoning, lest our Republic succumb to the "progressive" disease of the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

In other words a private can overrule his sergeant ... Riiiiiiiight ... I’d like to see that happen


7 posted on 04/30/2024 8:26:03 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

Was very very glad to see this - but lefties like Newsom and Scott Weiner never give up, they’ll be back to fight this, of that you can be sure. Hated that the state usurped over local zoning laws and imposed destructive housing policies on single-family neighborhoods, in effect destroying them.

Cities are also mandated to create tens of thousands of new apartment buildings, including set-asides for low income housing. These huge monstrosities are going up on the edges of my town. My son looked into one that was recently finished and one-bedroom apartments were going for around $2,000/month and up.

The ADUs that are going up, from talking to my neighbors, seem to be for elderly relatives, not to use as rentals or for AirBNB - people are afraid of squatters or non-paying renters - who have all the laws on their side in this sorry sate.

Love my state. Hate its government.


8 posted on 04/30/2024 8:26:42 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

A home two doors down recently sold on my block (So Cal) - my next door neighbor was almost hysterical - he was sure at least four units were going to be built next to his home, which is legal - since the state usurped local zoning laws - all of them. Our city council has tried to fight these massive developments and has lost every single court case.

A historic area was torn down due to new state regulations - the city could’t get the historic designation and lost in court, neighbors were furious. 93 condos are going up in its place.

We ended up getting nice new neighbors from Texas - very odd for them to move here, it’s almost always the other way around - they are putting in an ADU for their elderly parents.


9 posted on 04/30/2024 8:30:48 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble
Agree. I suggest people read the article(s).

"A Los Angeles County judge found that charter cities aren’t subject to Senate Bill 9, the 2021 “duplex” law that allows up to four homes to be built on a lot in single-family neighborhoods.

The law fails to accomplish its stated purpose of creating more affordable housing, and therefore, doesn’t meet the high bar of overriding local control over zoning, Superior Court Judge Curtis Kin said in a ruling released Wednesday, April 24.

SB 9 “is neither reasonably related to its stated concern of ensuring access to affordable housing nor narrowly tailored to avoid interference with local government,” Kin wrote.

The ruling applies only to the state’s 121 charter cities, not to more than 400 “general law” cities and counties operating without their own charters.

10 posted on 04/30/2024 8:33:21 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble
The property taxes in Texas are outrageous. I've been looking and would never move there because of that.

I live in one of the plaintiff Charter Cities. As long as my property taxes remain under Proposition 13 (19), I may stay put. I haven't found anywhere else with the benefit of $1300 annual property taxes. Not even close.

11 posted on 04/30/2024 8:37:34 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
That means any community can set its own gun laws, concealed carry rules, etc.

That isn't the scope of the ruling.

A California court ruled state laws cannot broadly override local control over development and zoning...

12 posted on 04/30/2024 8:47:39 AM PDT by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Thank you. If its scope limited to zoning, I agree.


13 posted on 04/30/2024 8:49:23 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

The ruling applies only to the state’s 121 charter cities, not to more than 400 “general law” cities and counties operating without their own charters.

Wiki notes: As of Jan 26, 2022, there were 482 incorporated municipalities in the state

Side Note: There are less cities and towns in California than in the State of Maine which has 528 cities and towns.


14 posted on 04/30/2024 9:07:10 AM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

I live in one of the plaintiff Charter Cities. As long as my property taxes remain under Proposition 13 (19), I may stay put. I haven’t found anywhere else with the benefit of $1300 annual property taxes. Not even close.

You are benefiting from Prop 13 as without it, your taxes would be significantly higher and I dare say higher than Texas. Your local government is not spending much less than it would without Prop 13, it is just passing on those costs to property owners not covered by Prop 13.


15 posted on 04/30/2024 9:10:11 AM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

Foundational Aspects of Charter Cities
What is the Constitutional Framework for Charter Cities?
Article XI, section 3(a) of the California Constitution authorizes the adoption of a city charter and provides such a charter has the force and effect of state law. Article XI,
section 5(a), the “home rule” provision, affirmatively grants to charter cities supremacy over “municipal affairs.”

https://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/Albuquerque3_-_Foundational_Aspects_of_Charter_Cities.pdf

California is a home rule state which grants sovereignty to specific local forms of governments. The state is forbidden by the California constitution to usurp local sovereignty.

It’s another tool patriots can use to take control of their local communities.


16 posted on 04/30/2024 9:25:09 AM PDT by sergeantdave (AI training involves stealing content from creators and not paying them a penny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

No. Reread the article. This pertains to zoning laws.


17 posted on 04/30/2024 9:29:33 AM PDT by DownInFlames (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson