Posted on 04/30/2024 8:05:14 AM PDT by Red Badger
Useless theater. Will be instantly dismissed. She broke with Trump when it really mattered—the budget and FISA.
President Trump said “We are at war.”
This present US House of Representatives wills that their obligation to declare war is never heard.
Infiltration.
Colour Revolution.
Information Warfare.
Incitement.
It’s all too new to the American experience to fit the standard. But, it is war against the Republic, nevertheless.
The broad Conspiracy is simple— to increase the numbers of infiltrators, and, the numbers of revolutionaries.
The goal is evidently to cause the increases to reach a point of exponential and therefore increase even faster.
The warfare is driven in the 24/7 “Information” distributed by the Big Media Complex and Big Tech Communication conglomerates.
So I’m not sure why there are endless hearings and the passing of official letters, always “strongly worded”, by the Legislative Branch to the Executive Branch, but were no IMPEACHMENTS and no witholding of the PURSE.
Current numbers find the House Republican majority so now shrunk as to become practically compliant in the Seditious activity of the Domestic Enemies, who compose the Democrat Congress of UniParty.
It’s very stressful. The People are outgunned and so encircled that we are allowed one vote in November. If we object to a Steal, we land on the template for being criminals in need of a lawyer we can not afford, and jail in a Gulag.
“It is not the vote that counts, but Who counts the votes.”
Americans have largely not participated in their Party’s future at any level— at precinct, county or state.
It’s very scary how fast even great nations can fall. The world will be changed. How it was allowed to happen is a story that historically is be usually reduced to lore and eventually forgotten.
She should have filed it with the SCOTUS....
Would have saved alot of time and expense for everybody.
Jack Smith’s appointment as ‘special prosecutor’ violates the special prosecutor statute. That means that the Executive Branch has broken the law to go after Trump. It’s more than an ‘Ethics’ Violation.
How many Ivy League Presidents did you take down from behind your nick on FR?
It’s on record—which is better than nothing.
Slightly. 😊👍
People get put in jail for contempt of court every single day in this country. Courts consistently rule in favor of judges having the right to order speech restrictions on defendants CURRENTLY on trial, this has NEVER been found to have first amendment implications.
Read what I wrote. I've voted for Trump four times now and will vote for him in November if I have to write him in.
But he CAN be jailed for contempt of court, that's not controversial in the slightest, and all I said was it could be part of his campaign strategy.
Serious about what?
I think it's a serious question IF you are CURRENTLY on trial under an indictment AND you choose to be openly contemptuous of the court you are in, if that means you want to be sent to jail, because that happens every day in this country.
The universities did not change one bit as a result. Another lib just came right off the assembly line to fill the spot.
I’m tired of these publicity hound women in the Republican party. Trump did things that were meaningful. Boebert, Greene, and Stefanik are all just talk.
So he should not object to the gag orders?
Bingo!
I don’t particularly care about your voting record. Doesn’t make you smart. If people are being deprived of their first ammendment rights “daily” then it’s a travesty of justice “daily”. It’s the equivalent to telling a woman not to scream while you’re raping her then blaming the woman when the rapist puke punches her to shut her up. If what they are doing to Trump is indicative of what is being done to innocent defendents nationwide on a daily basis then the country more than ever needs a radical revolution be it from the left or from the right. Such things should never ever be excepted!
Oh Good!
A strongly Worded Letter.
She continues to vote for money for Ukraine, she also voted to pass the bill to keep up the FISA spying, also voted to raise the debt ceiling again, also voted YEA on the last spending CR. Not sure if I have all of the terminology correct, but she sure does not vote with the MAGA republicans. Hardly loyal, IMHO.
People in court who disrupt the proceedings are in contempt. Trump has done none of that. Your defense of this unconstitutional government order using such a strawman fallacy is very weak.
Trump has every constitutional right to defend himself in public outside of court. Government has no constitutional right to gag people as they prosecute them. You don't see how that can easily lead to tyranny.
The idea behind the First Amendment is pretty simple and pretty clear.
So he should not object to the gag orders?
Why is it the women who have the most balls in the RINOpublican party?
Well, she is addressing him with the title he was given (wrongly or not) and that he is using in order to properly identify him in her complaint.
About time illegal election interference get addressed suspect more information to ensue.
Jack may start drinking earlier now?.
The frog getting a bath?.
Right…and Columbia would have ALWAYS threatened rioting students with expulsion. That ABSOLUTELY has no bearing on the shellacking their leadership got by Stefanik, and the resultant donor exodus.
Stefanik’s baseline isn’t Trump. It’s FReeperville. And so far, except for JimRob and buckhead and a handful of others, she is light years more impactful than the whiners. To wit: nobody is interviewing GulliverSwift, laplata, or DoodleBob (though LS quoted me a few years ago).
Of course public servants are not beyond reproach. And Trey Gowdy wins the Lifetime Oscar for Most Bark from a Useless Pol. But Stefanik helped launch a counteroffensive, and minimizing that impact is absurd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.