Posted on 04/24/2024 1:01:04 PM PDT by Morgana
The Arizona state House has bowed to the pro-abortion mob by approving a measure to repeal the state’s new abortion ban before it ever reached implementation to begin saving babies.
With the ban repealed, babies would lose almost all protection in the state. A 15-week abortion ban would go into place that only allows protecting babies up to that point – meaning 90% of more abortions would become legal.
The pro-life group Center for Arizona Policy lameted the vote in comments to LifeNews.
“Today’s House vote to repeal the pre-Roe law opens the door to great loss of life for unborn children and harm to women. With the Senate already on record to vote on the repeal, the most protective pro-life law in the country is poised to fall to the appetites of pro-abortion activists,” it said.
“The law to limit abortion to cases where the woman’s life is in danger was in effect in January of 1973 when Roe v Wadewas wrongly decided and should be in effect today. It was reaffirmed by a bipartisan legislature and the governor in 1977,” it added. “I applaud those lawmakers who stood boldly for the unborn and their mothers and made the effort today to force Arizona Attorney General to defend the state’s 15-week law if the pre-Roe law was repealed.”
Democrats prevailed on the vote to repeal the law because three Republicans joined them, including Matt Gress, Tim Dunn, and Justin Wilmeth.
Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Jake Warner said the abortion ban should stand.
“Life is a human right, and the Arizona Legislature has again reaffirmed that fundamental right. Life begins at conception. At just six weeks, unborn babies’ hearts begin to beat. At eight weeks, they have fingers and toes. And at 10 weeks, their unique fingerprints begin to form. Arizona’s pro-life law has protected unborn children for more than 100 years, and the people of Arizona, through their elected representatives, have repeatedly affirmed that law,” he said.
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled recently to uphold the state’s pro-life law as written by overturning a lower court decision that misinterpreted the law.
“We conclude that [Arizona’s law] does not create a right to, or otherwise provide independent statutory authority for, an abortion that repeals or restricts [the law], but rather is predicated entirely on the existence of a federal constitutional right to an abortion since disclaimed by Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization,” the court wrote in its opinion in Planned Parenthood Arizona v. Mayes. “Absent the federal constitutional abortion right, and because [the law] does not independently authorize abortion, there is no provision in federal or state law prohibiting [the law’s] operation. Accordingly, [Arizona’s law] is now enforceable.”
After the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the state’s abortion ban, one of the big attacks against it is that the 1864 law supposedly doesn’t represent the will of the people and is antiquated. Trump referred to that in his post.
But that contention is not true.
First, the judges on the Arizona Supreme Court represent the people. The seven justices on the state’s highest court are initially appointed by the governor to serve. They then stand for a retention vote for regular terms of six years and that is a ballot vote cast by Arizona voters. As a result, the justices represent the people via electing the governor and electing them directly.
Secondly, the law was affirmed twice after it was initially approved in 1864. As CatholicVote notes in an article:
The over century-and-a-half-old law is set to replace the state’s existing pro-life law which only protects most unborn children after 15 weeks gestation.
Republican then Gov. Doug Ducey signed the significantly weaker legislation into law in March 2022. Less than three months later, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturning Roe v. Wade.
The Arizona Supreme Court held that the 2022 law “is predicated entirely on the existence of a federal constitutional right to an abortion since disclaimed” by the Dobbs decision.
Axios reported that “[a] provision of the 2022 law had affirmed it wasn’t repealing the 19th-century law.”
FOX News noted that the 1864 law “was codified in 1913 after Arizona became a state” and “includes an exception in cases where the mother’s life is at risk.”
Planned Parenthood was challenging the potential reinstatement of the state’s near-total abortion ban from 1864, which has exceptions for life-threatening emergencies, but had been blocked by 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. The Dobbs ruling should allow it to go into effect but the nation’s biggest abortion business challenged it.
Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys represented Dr. Eric Hazelrigg, an obstetrician and medical director of Choices Pregnancy Center in Arizona, who filed a petition last March asking the state’s high court to review an Arizona Court of Appeals ruling.
The appellate court’s ruling misinterpreted state law, against its plain meaning, to allow abortion in circumstances where the Arizona Legislature prohibited it. It also enjoined officials from fully enforcing the state’s pro-life law to protect unborn children. The Arizona Supreme Court reversed this ruling, allowing the law to be enforced as written.
“Life is a human right, and today’s decision allows the state to respect that right and fully protect life again—just as the legislature intended,” said ADF Senior Counsel Jake Warner, who argued before the court. “Life begins at conception. At just six weeks, unborn babies’ hearts begin to beat. At eight weeks, they have fingers and toes. And at 10 weeks, their unique fingerprints begin to form. Arizona’s pro-life law has protected unborn children for over 100 years, and the people of Arizona, through their elected representatives, have repeatedly affirmed that law, including as recently as 2022. We celebrate the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision that allows the state’s pro-life law to again protect the lives of countless, innocent unborn children.”
In September 2022, the Arizona Superior Court in Pima County appointed Dr. Hazelrigg as the substitute guardian ad litem to legally represent the best interests of unborn children in Arizona, a role Arizona courts have recognized for over 50 years.
Kari Lake asked them to, she wants to minimize the abortion issue.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-arizona-abortion-ruling-went-far-rcna147217
“Yeah, they did,” Trump said about the court’s judges when he was asked whether they went too far. “That’ll be straightened out, and as you know it’s all about states’ rights.”
He predicted that Arizona’s governor and others “are going to bring it back into reason.”
So, it sucks.
You cannot go from one extreme to the other without friction.
Several generations of Americans have had abortion on demand shape their lives, right or wrong (wrong IMO).
It will take time to change the mindset of people. Several generations will likely have to pass before attitudes are slowly changed to reject abortion for the most part.
Yeah, it sucks, but it’s the reality we have.
“Kari Lake asked them to, she wants to minimize the abortion issue.”
Shortsighted and stupid. Here’s the problem:
If the Democrats could wave a magic wand and make free abortion on demand legal in all 50 states with no exceptions, some Republicans — like Lake — would think they are oh-so-smart and go along with that scheme for tactical reasons, i.e. to “minimize the issue” by supposedly keeping it off of election ballots forever. After all, the issue would be “settled” at that point.
Bzzzt! Wrong!
Even if that magic wand was waved, Democrats would STILL energize their satanic voters in EVERY election from there on out by alleging that “you must keep voting for Democrats or those evil Republicans will TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHTS!”
Because it been so wildly effective for the left, even in “red” states, abortion will from now on ALWAYS be on the ballot in every election, explicitly or not.
You don’t win by caving, Kari. In fact, *you* don’t win at all.
It will eventually peter out without being banned, somewhat like smoking. But it will take a lot of education, gruesome graphic images and videos to change enough libs’ minds.
...their time is almost up, God has had enough and will take action against America soon to stop it, as we are unable to govern ourselves for the greater good.
What kind of mother would not hesitate to give their life for their child????? Apparently a bunch of MAGA moms.
Their children must be proud to know who really matters.
#EarnMyProLifeVote
Demoncrazy triumphant!
Law is not about morality. Jesus said that while God hates divorce, God allowed it in Israel’s law “because your hearts were hard.”
The moral issue is clear, but we need to win the argument and not try to push too far past what the majority will accept. If we push for too much too fast, we WILL get abortions to 9 months, and maybe beyond.
I fear you are correct.
>>”If the Democrats could wave a magic wand and make free abortion on demand legal in all 50 states with no exceptions, some Republicans — like Lake — would think they are oh-so-smart and go along with that scheme for tactical reasons,”
That’s simply incorrect and does not represent Kari Lake’s position nor that of many Republicans who think that reinstituting a law from around 150 years ago was not only a mistake, politically speaking, but, considering it made no exceptions for life of the mother, morally wrong.
And let me emphasize why allowing the old law to stand would have been a political blunder. The bottom line is that the old law was always going to be repealed one way or another, if not by the legislature then by voter referendum soon after the November election. Arizona is a swing state with a majority of voters believing the old law is too extreme. If we were talking about Wyoming or some other deeply red state, that might not be the case but it is in AZ. Repealing it now, rather than pushing repeal until after the election very possibly could have resulted in Trump losing the state and Kari Lake losing the senate seat to whichever lunatic Democrat she’ll be facing.
Now if abortion is the only issue that matters to you then I’d say you’re right to react the way you are, if it weren’t for the fact that your short-sided all or nothing approach
will often do more harm than good to the pro-life cause and lead to more abortions, not less.
Not only her...
Arriving for a campaign fundraiser in Atlanta, Trump said the Arizona court decision went too far and called on state lawmakers to change it even as he defended the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 ruling overturning of Roe v. Wade.
"It's all about states' rights," the former president told supporters and journalists. "It'll be straightened out."
one issue voters marginalize themselves and in the process lose any credibility they may have on society at large. many of the one issue maroons posting here use terms like principals or conscience but in society at large these terms mean absolutely nothing. by all means vote your conscience but if your side loses over and over and you can’t get even a foothold against the other side just remember the 1st rule of insanity. fyi...my personal position is killing babies before they can even take their first breath is evil and immoral but lesson one for ANYONE who believes in doing the right thing is simple...you can’t TELL other people what to do. when you do they just shun you. that’s just how real life works. just my 2
It takes all kinds to kill innocent, defenseless Americans.
Pretty much
It sucks in the sense that now the argument can be made without washing nearly all the Republicans out of government, and allowing *unlimited* abortion when the Democrats *fix* it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.