Posted on 04/24/2024 11:31:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The leading third-party candidate for president of the United States has revealed a new position on abortion that includes a proposal to expand childcare benefits, prompting mixed reactions from pro-life groups.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is pursuing an independent bid for the presidency in the 2024 presidential election, released an updated abortion platform on his website last week. The platform, titled “More Choices, More Life,” is plugged as a way to “dramatically reduce abortion in this country.”
The candidate is calling for a “massive subsidized daycare initiative” while vowing to “safeguard women’s reproductive rights.” He vows that the policy will “pay 100% of care for the three million children under five who live beneath our poverty line” while capping the cost of daycare at “10% of family income for everyone else.”
“These payments will not be available to corporate daycare chains or the hedge funds that own them,” the campaign clarified. “They will fund only single-location small businesses — as well as parents who decide to stay home with their children.”
The campaign predicted that “since economics is a major driver of abortion, this policy will do more to lower abortion rates than any coercive measure ever could.” The policy proposal identifies the redirection of “funds being spent on the war in Ukraine” to pay for the massive undertaking.
In addition to the daycare initiative, the “More Choices, More Life” agenda calls for a strengthened “adoption infrastructure” consisting of an increased child tax credit and funding “sanctuaries for women in need to have babies, places like Angie’s House where they get support not just in pregnancy and birth but also in those precious months afterwards.”
The campaign asserted that the funding of such organizations would ensure women that “their only ‘choice’ isn’t abortion.”
Under the policy, the campaign contended, women will find that “they have another choice, a viable choice to give birth.”
The campaign added, “Abortion is one of the most divisive issues in American politics” where Americans “are offered two positions — pro-life and pro-choice — with hardly any room between or outside them.” Democrats, led by President Joe Biden, have embraced the “pro-choice” position that enables women to have abortions throughout most or all of pregnancy.
While pro-life groups opposed to abortion have generally gotten behind former President Donald Trump in the upcoming 2024 presidential election, some pro-life advocacy groups have expressed concerns over Trump’s position that abortion should be up to the states to decide. Pro-life organizations offered differing reactions to the Kennedy campaign’s newly unveiled abortion policy.
Brian Burch, president of the pro-life advocacy group CatholicVote, reacted to the candidate’s policy proposal in a statement published Tuesday. “RFK Jr.’s abortion policy offers a stark contrast to the ‘shout your abortion’ extremism coming from the Biden campaign,” he said. “While RFK Jr. is wrong for pledging to continue to protect the ‘right’ to destroy innocent lives, he deserves credit for not ducking the need to help women choose life.”
“[Kennedy] also deserves credit for recognizing the unique role of stay at home parents by proposing that any daycare subsidies equally apply to mothers or fathers who choose to stay home to raise their children,” he added. “Kennedy’s position, while problematic in principle, aims in the right direction.”
In a statement shared with The Christian Post, National Right to Life President Carol Tobias stressed that “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. supports unlimited abortion throughout pregnancy and he wants taxpayer dollars to pay for it. He does not believe states should be able to protect preborn children at any stage of development and supports tax funding of Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion chain.”
“It is hypocritical, then, to pretend to care about helping women in difficult circumstances when those same women are being encouraged by a culture that tells them to kill their children,” Tobias contended. “Far better are the candidates who care about, and are willing to help, both mother and child.”
At the beginning of the Kennedy campaign, its official website didn't contain an entire section devoted to abortion. Instead, the candidate’s position on abortion was included on a page illustrating his vow to “Heal the Divide.” The campaign stated that “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has clear positions on most of today’s divisive trigger issues like abortion, guns, and immigration, but he knows that both sides have legitimate concerns and legitimate moral positions.”
“Few relish the thought of dead fetuses, nor do they want to force women to have unwanted babies,” the website declared. “Robert F. Kennedy will draw on the broad moral agreements beneath our divisions. He will model careful listening, and create conditions where each group can hear the stories of the other. He will lead the way toward national reconciliation, respectful dialog, and willingness to change, to grow, and to forgive.”
The RealClearPolitics average of polls asking voters who they would support in a five-way race, based on surveys taken from March 27-April 18, shows Kennedy capturing 8.8% of the vote, coming in far behind Trump’s 41.6% and Biden’s 40.6%, while finishing ahead of independent candidate Cornel West’s 1.7% and potential Green Party nominee Jill Stein’s 1.0%.
However, Kennedy’s presence on the ballot in each of the 50 states, or lack thereof, will define the impact or success of his candidacy. As of Tuesday, the Kennedy campaign has secured ballot access in nine states that boast a combined 66 electoral votes, coming up short of the 270 electoral votes required to win the presidency: Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Michigan, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina and Utah.
More handouts to the richest poor people in the world, including refundable tax credits for people who dont pay taxes. Hooray
Dems never have seen a problem that can’t be “solved” by spending Trillions.
His proposal does just that, but won’t solve the problem.
“Tiny American flags for some!”
Yes...I can see absolutely no downside to this. Certainly no chance of child care scarcity or reduced standards of care. That would be very unlikely.... /sarc
If this program is ever implemented, the Dims will restrict daycare funding from all daycare facilities that refuse to groom kids.
Slaughtering babies is not a *reproductive right*.
He’d be better than any other democrat running, though.
I don't expect his campaign will get anywhere. But if he manages to look like he might spoil it for Biden, he will meet the same fate as his father.
This guy is such a mess.
His premise - that abortion is driven by economic circumstances - is wrong.
No more welfare. Create conditions in which women are able and willing to stay home and take care of the kids.
Also states need to wake up and stop the infanticide.
If we could get an amendment to protect life, great. We aren’t at that point yet. Someday, perhaps.
The problem with these Democrat socialist ideas such as this one — lots of government employees to raise promiscuous people’s unwanted children— is that you cannot pay people enough to be decent and kind.
Those values were more common in our country when most people were Christians who still went to church, who stayed married, and relied on biological mothers at home and grandmothers to raise children. Many a bastard or orphan was passed off as a relative’s child and raised within the extended family.
Against today’s backdrop of ubiquitous lawlessness, porn, child abuse and a lucrative child trafficking underclass with foreign ties, no political party can just decree good conditions for illegitimate or unwanted kids.
There is simply no substitute for a Christ-centered marriage and culture in which to raise kids.
...... Studies show that somewhere around 40% of abortions occur simply as a result of Financial Stress to the Mother/Family. With that in mind, Republicans need to at least try to diminish the exponentially growing massive Market for Baby Killing in this country. They need to come up with some options.
.... In order to do that will require some creative solutions if the GOP ever wants to succeed in countering this permanently changed behavioral mindset that has befallen our collapsing nation that is leading to so many abortions.
..... If this Financial stress issue could be properly addressed and marketed ..... it could very well negate almost half of the abortion need/market if done right and millions of lives could be saved.
...... Either that or we could just collectively sit around and grumble and complain about all of the abortions happening in this country and do nothing about it.
.
He thinks these women are going to care for their child???? He obviously hasn’t gotten out much since the 80s. These women lack any love for anyone but themselves. These are the women who will lock the kids in a basement to starve while taxpayers fund their vacations.
They are lying about no choice. If they were about choice they would have gone for adoption which pays for their prenatal care and delivery.
Heck we have republican women stating the A. Law goes to far.. it even MAGA women in AZ would give their life for their child.
They say that with their support for life of the mother.
They sat ther very own children are alive today only because their own mothers were healthy.
#EarnMyProlifeVote
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.