>Don’t know whose idea the “fake/alternate” elector plan was, but it was a stupid ploy from the first.
It’s how it’s been done in the past, as recently as Bush v Gore. Gore sent “fake” electors. Actually the term is alternate electors so both sides are represented dependent on court cases.
There is nothing wrong with it and there is ample precedence.
EC
In Bush v. Gore and the Hawaii case everyone likes to talk about, the alternate slate of electors was actually certified by the state of origin.
In Michigan, somebody decided to create fake elector certificates and forge the signatures.
See the difference?
Just about every case they’ve brought can be held up to the benchmark of precedent or worse.... preferential, selective prosecution...already pointed out once by the SC.