Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liz Cheney: The Supreme Court Should Rule Swiftly on Trump’s Immunity Claim
New York Times ^ | April 22, 2024 | Liz Cheney

Posted on 04/22/2024 7:17:25 AM PDT by lowbridge

On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Donald Trump’s arguments that he is immune from prosecution for his efforts to steal the 2020 presidential election. It is likely that all — or nearly all — of the justices agree that a former president who attempted to seize power and remain in office illegally can be prosecuted. I suspect that some justices may also wish to clarify whether doctrines of presidential immunity might apply in other contexts — for example, to a president’s actions as commander in chief during a time of war. But the justices should also recognize the profoundly negative impact they may have if the court does not resolve these issues quickly and decisively.

If delay prevents this Trump case from being tried this year, the public may never hear critical and historic evidence developed before the grand jury, and our system may never hold the man most responsible for Jan. 6 to account.

The Jan. 6 House select committee’s hearings and final report in 2022 relied on testimony given by dozens of Republicans — including many who worked closely with Mr. Trump in the White House, in his Justice Department and on his 2020 presidential campaign. Special counsel Jack Smith’s election-related indictment of Mr. Trump relies on many of the same firsthand witnesses. Although the special counsel reached a number of the same conclusions as the select committee, the indictment is predicated on a separate and independent investigation. Evidence was developed and presented to a grand jury sitting in Washington, D.C.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheney; immunity; lizardcheney; lizcheney; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
"the public may never hear critical and historic evidence developed"

Isn't that rich. Didn't the January 6 committee withhold, suppress, and destroy evidence?

1 posted on 04/22/2024 7:17:25 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Liz Cheney. That’s where I stopped reading.


2 posted on 04/22/2024 7:20:38 AM PDT by MeganC ("Russians are subhuman" - posted by Kazan 8 March 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
It is likely that all — or nearly all — of the justices agree that a former president who attempted to seize power and remain in office illegally can be prosecuted.

That statement is correct. However, it has nothing to do with what happened on January 6th.

3 posted on 04/22/2024 7:21:21 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Go catch some flies Lizard.


4 posted on 04/22/2024 7:21:36 AM PDT by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

It’s afraid....


5 posted on 04/22/2024 7:25:23 AM PDT by lgjhn23 ("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created..." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Reminded me to take out the trash


6 posted on 04/22/2024 7:28:19 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The dems seem to think that the American public lives and breathes “JAN. 6TH!!!” every day of their lives. No one is voting based on Jan 6, in my opinion.


7 posted on 04/22/2024 7:28:35 AM PDT by NorthWoody (Half of all people are below average, and half of those are in the bottom 25%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Liz trying to get her name in the press again. I think she realizes that her 15 minutes of fame are almost up. Ironically, she should be praying that Trump gets elected. That’s the only thing that will keep her grift going.


8 posted on 04/22/2024 7:29:59 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthWoody

And DJT was still president on J6


9 posted on 04/22/2024 7:30:38 AM PDT by TStro (God created everyone equal. Samuel Colt made them polite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
It is likely that all — or nearly all — of the justices agree that a former president who attempted to seize power and remain in office illegally can be prosecuted.

But if that had been the case for PDJT he ought to have been convicted in the impeachment trial. He wasn't!

10 posted on 04/22/2024 7:32:04 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Hey Liz, didn’t the voters kick you out of Wyoming by their vote? Take comfort that it was just a vote and not torches and pitchforks.


11 posted on 04/22/2024 7:33:13 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Sounds like her case of drug resistant syphilis is kicking up again.
12 posted on 04/22/2024 7:37:47 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

No Immunity for Trump means no Immunity for all politicians and any damage they do they should be sued


13 posted on 04/22/2024 7:39:41 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

No wonder she GOT VOTED OUT !!!


14 posted on 04/22/2024 7:41:22 AM PDT by Pearfect (Ou can't beat the competition lock them u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

“of the justices agree that a former president who attempted to seize power and remain in office illegally”

Would like to hear the NYT explain exactly how Trump tried to do that.

Such nonsense.


15 posted on 04/22/2024 7:41:40 AM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

She should be very careful here. I’d hate to see Dick Cheney arrested and put on trial for Iraq.


16 posted on 04/22/2024 7:43:33 AM PDT by nonliberal (Z.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The skunk should be locked up. RINOs are a danger to the republic.


17 posted on 04/22/2024 7:50:35 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

She’s right. They should swiftly reiterate the importance of Presidential immunity, stop the show trials. And then imprison those like Cheney who dishonestly attempted to prosecute non-crimes for political gains.


18 posted on 04/22/2024 7:51:35 AM PDT by BuchananBrigadeTrumpFan (If in doubt, it's probably sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Exactly....Im not sure any Justices think such a thing happened to be honest. They would need to stick to the facts. Trump words, actions certainly do not lend credence to the conspiracy. Just last week NG and Capitol police basically corroborated Trump claims of security being turned down because of “optics.” and video shows us all where the violence started.... with the police. Trump is constitutionally allowed to dispute an election , especially one that contained so many anomalies and alternate electors certainly weren’t invented by Trump... its part of the process.


19 posted on 04/22/2024 8:07:36 AM PDT by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

“the public may never hear critical and historic evidence developed”
Isn’t that rich. Didn’t the January 6 committee withhold, suppress, and destroy evidence?

Yes, they did. They did it with eyes open. The had people testify that they knew were lying, and whistleblowers suppressed that stated they had proof. Basically, the Jan. 6th committee destroyed and suppressed evidence for political purposes, and denied the public access to the work product. They violated the laws. The Jan. 6th committee members are not above the law, but nothing has been done to them because they did the ‘uniparty’ attack on Trump. Trump isn’t above the law, he is below the law. The future will not look kindly on the acts of the Jan 6th committee, nor the acts of the current executive, done for political purposes.

Hard to believe we used to be a Constitutional Republic, what is occurring now is so Hitler and Stalinist.


20 posted on 04/22/2024 8:15:15 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan (Repeatedl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson