I’d like to hear that from his mouth, Linda.
And so far… for a man who proudly takes credit for things he shouldn’t (like the Covid vax) he hasn’t said a peep…
“This aid package has a loan component it. This would not have passed without Donald Trump. I want to thank the House speaker and Hakeem Jeffries woking together in a bipartisan fashion to give weapons to Ukraine to fight a fight that matters to us. President Trump has created a loan component to this package that gives us leverage down the road.”
Also profiting from an orgy of mass murder just to spite Trump.
We need war crimes trials.
“The Ukrainian military, with our help, has killed about 50% of the combat power of the Russians”
The guy is nuts.
This man keeps grabbing the sharp objects and inflicting wounds on those he claims are his friends.
It’s incredible to me that they talk about blowing up the bridge as if there is no way for there to be any consequences or retaliation for it. Incredible
He’s probably right.
Abortion, border, Ukraine, what's next?
I think Trump 'helped' get 23 billion of the 'Ukrainian Aid' package to resupply American military stockpiles and convinced them to make the 14 Billion in advanced new weapon systems funding benefit the US by purchasing from US defense contractors, and he suggested previously that the military aid to the Ukraine a loan instead of outright gift.Note the article, and the Dems are phrasing the resupply of the American military as 'opening the door to more transfers to the Ukraine' because hey, Dems are not just gonna supply our own military after giving as much as we did to the Ukraine.
But really, this package gives 23B to resupply our military, 14B to our US defense contractors, and 11B to US military operations in Ukraine, with 8B going to Ukraine's basic operations (salaries, pensions, emergency services and a pile of domestic aid to keep the semblance of civilization).
Yang Tian and agenciesSat 20 Apr 2024 22.33 EDT"In the Ukraine bill, of the $60.7bn, a total of about $23bn would be used by the US to replenish its military stockpiles, opening the door to future US military transfers to Ukraine. Another $14bn would go to the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, in which the Pentagon buys advanced new weapon systems for the Ukrainian military directly from US defence contractors.
There is also more than $11bn to fund current US military operations in the region, enhancing the capabilities of the Ukrainian military and fostering intelligence collaboration between Kyiv and Washington; and about $8bn in non-military assistance, such as helping Ukraine’s government continue basic operations, including the payment of salaries and pensions."
Maybe Trump supported it.
Maybe Trump didn’t.
Fact is Trump carries little or no weight inside the beltway or the halls of congress.
Trump’s first term proved that.
If Trump had support within the Republican wing of the Uniparty of which is led in part by Goober Grahamnesty then a wall would have been built.
Shut up Linda. Nobody cares about what you say.
Graham and Hillary are like old sciatic nerve pain that you just can’t seem to get out of your life. Returning at any moment to cause misery.
Linda’s in a panic.
When Ukraine falls, he’ll have to find another war for his “ pals at the Pentagon “.
Linda is lying again. Trump just said if you’re gonna give Ukraine money it should at least be in the firm of a loan.
I believe that Johnson was summoned to Mar A Lago to discuss "The Art of the Deal". And I believe that Johnson divided the the deals into 3 or 4 phases...to let everyone who wishes....hang themselves.
There would be plenty of both for and against Ukraine...That's not on Johnson...that's on the individual house rep...
But Israel...that's the deal that has to go through...now...and it did.
It also proved that the majority wanted Ukraine funded.
And that it's all about getting the Whitehouse and Senate and House in 2024.
Correct. Which is why Trump will lose the election now.
Lindsey needs to eat a box of Ex-Lax.
They will be asking for another 60 billion by December.