The underlying argument against Roe v. Wade by the pro-life side was that abortion is NOT a Federal issue but should be addressed by the states. These people come across as insincere and underhanded when they now stake out a position that UNDERMINES the successful legal argument that won the day in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Don’t you think we risk loss pushing pro-life, just as much as if we acquiesce and let the pro-abortion people run amok? I fear we lose with both, which is what the essay points out. But what is the middle ground? And can Republicans credibly claim it?
“””The underlying argument against Roe v. Wade by the pro-life side was that abortion is NOT a Federal issue but should be addressed by the states.””””
You keep posting that pro-abortion lie, the attack on the Supreme Court making law, and that a law legalizing abortion was not the pro-life movement fighting for states rights.