Not arguing about the wisdom of having this argument be worked out within the states rather than at a federal level. I agree with that at this point.
But I do think it will be hard to keep it that way just because of the way the left fights. For instance, Indiana’s abortion ban has been challenged by jews claiming that their religion requires them to abort if that is what would make them happy, and the state’s religious freedom law makes it so that laws cannot restrict a person’s freedom to practice religion. Thus the abortion ban violates the religious freedom law.
And a state court agreed with them, paving the way for some really, really bad crap.
Satanists have also argued that killing young ones is their religion, so restricting abortion (and I would add restricting infanticide also, as long as their religion orders human murder) is a freedom of religion issue. Making it a First Amendment issue.
If that’s the route that the left is going to take via their 2 Beasts of Revelation, Muslims could also say that freedom of religion means they must be allowed to kill infidels as required by their religion.
I don’t see any way that this doesn’t end up before SCOTUS again, just because of the way the left is Hell-bent on getting rid of the sanctity of ALL human life, not just the pre-born. AFter all, that is the whole WEF schtick: get rid of 90% of the world’s population because people are no more valuable than cockroaches. It’s truly the same philosophy as Nazism and justifies methods that many are beginning to realize are real: killing off people with known-dangerous “vaccines”, vaccinating people against their will via mosquitos or injected foods, etc
I’m wondering if the Indiana case gives a way for the public to think about this issue as involving something deeper than just their demand for sex without consequences.
The dems are going to make the election about abortion because they know a lot of voters are Hell-bent on it. I’m wondering if that strategy can backfire if people are brought to realize just what Hell these legal arguments could truly unleash on America. ESPECIALLY if taken together with the reality that we are being invaded by peoples who don’t think like Americans do. The sanctity of ANY human life is not only legally fragile but also PRACTICALLY fragile.
When people realize that THEY are literally fetuses in the minds of Klaus Schwab and other powerful world leaders..... they might think twice about how glibly “fetuses” should be allowed to be killed.
I’m imagining a meme where a woman says to her fetus: My religion says I can kill you, and the courts have upheld that freedom of religion.
And then a Muslim, MS-13 member, and Klaus Schwab replies to her by saying: My religion says I can kill YOU.
I’m not good at this kind of stuff, but there are people here who are.
I do think we’re going to have to deal with the abortion issue in some way. Neither the leftists nor media (but I repeat myself) are going to let us avoid that issue. If we’re forced to deal with it, we may as deal with it head-on.
Frankly, the 90%-Genocide-Crowd's best play is to cause a purposed global famine.
They can even blame Global Warming when they are done.