Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Maine legislature moves to have their “Electoral Vote” go towards the candidate who has the national popular vote. The Democrats working hard to neutralize the Electoral process one state at a time.
1 posted on 04/04/2024 12:46:48 PM PDT by grcuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: grcuster

The people of Maine have lost their power. This is unconstitutional, btw.


29 posted on 04/04/2024 1:13:47 PM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

Maine moves to join Democratic-led pact to create election interference and collusion to win an election by any means possible...

There-—fixed the title.


33 posted on 04/04/2024 1:20:21 PM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

Man, these people are stupid.


34 posted on 04/04/2024 1:21:01 PM PDT by Bullish (...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

How can one state ignore their residents vote results to other states to decide for them.


37 posted on 04/04/2024 1:24:44 PM PDT by midwest_hiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

So Maine wants to be politically irrelevant and ignored by all future federal governments.


40 posted on 04/04/2024 1:25:30 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

Constitutionally, this doesn’t work no matter how clever they think they are. You cannot do ends around the Constitution because if you could, then you’d simply tax guns out of existence or or do the same with ammo or just prohibit ammo from being sold. Any of that is, of course, an infringement and cannot stand. Same with banding states together and awarding their electors based on the popular vote. No one’s paid close attention to this because they haven’t gotten to the number that the States involved have agreed is required to actually kick in this agreement, but we should be making a lot more noise about it and why it’s wrong.


41 posted on 04/04/2024 1:25:56 PM PDT by Dahoser (I finally figured out what to call him: Fakephonyfraudident Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

We are a constitutional Republic not a Democracy. The Democrats want us to be a Democracy so all national elections would be decided by Democratic States on the East and West Coast and a few blue states in the middle of the country. Red states would not even to vote then as their votes would then be moot. Come on Republicans, challenge this in court before it’s too late.


42 posted on 04/04/2024 1:28:05 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

The whole “popular vote” agenda is an attempt tyring to avoid the legal route of amending the constitution, which is what is required to abolish the electoral college, and the “popular vote” is a defacto method of trying to do that.


43 posted on 04/04/2024 1:34:07 PM PDT by Wuli (ena)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster
A National Popular Vote should be unconstitutional. We don't vote directly for the President because the President is not the ruler of the People.

The President is the executive officer of the federation of states. It's the states that elect the President to oversee the limited powers that the states delegated to the federal government.

A National Popular Vote, along with the 17th amendment, will kill the concept of sovereign states once and for all.

The whole National Popular Vote compact should be nullified on 14th amendment equal protection grounds. In compact states that voted with the so-called "national popular vote," those voters had their votes count. In compact states that voted against the national popular vote, those voters had their votes discarded.

There is no equal protection across all the states that their votes will be counted the same way.

-PJ

45 posted on 04/04/2024 1:37:02 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

“ and simply makes sense: electing the president by popular vote,” former Michigan Republican Party Chairman Saul Anuzis told the Washington Examiner.”

Actually it makes NO sense since the President is appointed by the States, specifically by the 50 State Legislatures, and this is because to be President requires sufficient consensus among the States to acquire 270 votes.

Why should 75% of the voters in California, Illinois, and New York rule the small states?


47 posted on 04/04/2024 1:59:55 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

IMO it’s a violation of the Constitution for states to enter into any agreement or “compact” (my word) without the consent of Congress. For example,the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is allowed...but only because it was approved by Congress.


48 posted on 04/04/2024 2:05:59 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

This just means that a few national cheat centers will elect the president: KKKalifornia, Chicago and NYC.


49 posted on 04/04/2024 2:25:08 PM PDT by fwdude ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

This is ass-backwards. You want to do away with the Electoral College (and totally end the nation BTW), amend The Constitution. Of course Dems can never be bothered with that.


51 posted on 04/04/2024 2:40:51 PM PDT by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man.c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) is Un-Constitutional, because it subverts the primary purpose of the Electoral College:

For each state to vote as a member of the college of states - a weighted system, so that less populated states have some representation.

That more equitable representation among the states, is of course, in contrast to the wish of the communists and socialists, that the President be chosen by popular vote - leaving California and New York states, plus about three more states, choosing the President.


55 posted on 04/04/2024 3:09:56 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

People have no idea how radical Maine has become. We should ask them to rename the place the Soviet State of Northern Massachusetts.


56 posted on 04/04/2024 3:13:37 PM PDT by turfmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

pesky US Constitution in the way of that liberal unicorn...


57 posted on 04/04/2024 3:16:09 PM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

The Shut Up, Racist Peasants in the Backwoods Act.


58 posted on 04/04/2024 3:18:07 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster

The Founders knew what they were doing. The KNEW they didn’t want NYC or Philadelhia’s collective population to ramrod over the rest of the country’s and colonies’ interests. It’s the same way today - even worse.

This is a UNION of States, not frigging rat-infested megapopulation crap holes. There are more and values, wants, needs and goals of the entire UNION’s states that are rightly made to be part of the decision fabric in the Electoral College. Doing this is ‘difficult’ states for the Democrats is a mistake and would only result in a small d democratic disaster. This country ends - either on its on by democracy or by Civil War.


60 posted on 04/04/2024 3:26:18 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Correction, Maine starts move toward electoral irrelevance.


61 posted on 04/04/2024 3:27:59 PM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grcuster
tie Maine’s Electoral College votes for president to the country’s popular vote.

So the Presidential votes in Maine don't count for much, if anything.

64 posted on 04/04/2024 3:41:11 PM PDT by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson