Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong
1) It is relevant and material. Part of her argument in your link is liberals and the media said the shot would end covid. I agree. But also Trump was saying the same thing. That’s why it’s relevant. And I agree as time went by liberals were on the side of forcing it on us. But why is my issue material? Because a big part of her beef was it was “marketed” by liberals as the means to end covid. But Trump had said the same thing and he wasn’t in her equation. So there are 2 material issues. Trump also said it. She left out he said it.

Can you provide evidence of Trumps use of hydroxychoriquin. And that it worked.

3) I’ve considered it.

4) “How on Earth does Eastman get to this point of being ready to jettison the Constitution?” said one former fellow, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid alienating friends at the institute. “It’s by pushing deeper into this idea of natural rights, which justify any means necessary to preserve the republic. … That’s how Claremont goes from this quirky intellectual outfit to one of the main intellectual architects of trying to overthrow the republic.” That’s my concern about Eastman, Claremont and Klingenstein. Election results don’t matter. Even you noted Trump as a necessary strongman in the life and death struggle against what he called "woke communism." I have no live or desire for communism. I have no desire for election results not to matter.

I would say the TDS lands squarely ion your shoulders and the shoulders of those who think like you.

145 posted on 04/06/2024 7:25:05 PM PDT by joesbucks (For 2,000 years Christians have been warning of the Anti-Christ. Now they buy Bibles from him. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: joesbucks
1) It is relevant and material. Part of her argument in your link is liberals and the media said the shot would end covid. I agree. But also Trump was saying the same thing. That’s why it’s relevant. And I agree as time went by liberals were on the side of forcing it on us. But why is my issue material? Because a big part of her beef was it was “marketed” by liberals as the means to end covid. But Trump had said the same thing and he wasn’t in her equation. So there are 2 material issues. Trump also said it. She left out he said it.

Nope, just because you say it does, doesn't make it so. It boils down to incidence counts. They harped on it for more then 2 years, thousands of times by thousands of different individuals from every walks-of-life & professions proclaiming they were following the science, when in reality many do not even know science at all. Trump 1 time that you referenced.

Can you provide evidence of Trumps use of hydroxychoriquin And that it worked.

You are a lazy person, except when you want to find negative stuff on Trump.

Trump had no side effects after taking hydroxychloroquine, White House doctor says

3) I’ve considered it.

Well, either your "spell checker" auto-correct is as incompetent as you , or that is another lie you are employing as an excuse to cover up your sloppiness.

4) “How on Earth does Eastman get to this point of being ready to jettison the Constitution?” said one former fellow, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid alienating friends at the institute. “It’s by pushing deeper into this idea of natural rights, which justify any means necessary to preserve the republic. … That’s how Claremont goes from this quirky intellectual outfit to one of the main intellectual architects of trying to overthrow the republic.” That’s my concern about Eastman, Claremont and Klingenstein. Election results don’t matter.

Yeah, I always take claims from someone who remains anonymous, especially when they are Constitutionally wrong with regards to a man who is a known Constitutional scholar. Because you sorely lack critical thinking skills, but you do possess critical thinking, especially of those you hate.

May I remind you:

The people who cast the votes don't decide an election, the people who count the votes do. - Joseph Stalin" Since you do not believe the election was stolen, even though you have no proof whatsoever that it was a fair election, coupled with your obvious lack of critical think skills you probably son not understand what Stalin meant. furthermore, Biden emulates Stalin & Hitler far more than Trump does.

You are a pitiful excise for a human being

Even you noted Trump as a necessary strongman in the life and death struggle against what he called "woke communism."

I never said any such thing. Once again you lie. You just can't help yourself I guess when you know you are a loser & a simp.

I would say the TDS lands squarely ion your shoulders and the shoulders of those who think like you.

More evidence of your blatant ignorance. Go away Joe, you bore me to tears.

Because you are obtuse, stupid & a liar, I once again provide you with the opportunity to have the last word, This time I will hold fast to my promise to not respond, for it truly is a waste of my time. Because you aren't the least bit interested in the truth, or you lack the capacity to recognize the truth.

Either way, you are not worth it for me to keep trying with someone of your caliber.

Bye bye, little Joey. May you reap in life what you sow, in bountiful quantities.

146 posted on 04/06/2024 8:07:54 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson