I hate auto correct, as it often does it when I hit send. I was noting when Trump got Covid, none of the treatments he was touting were used in his treatment. Hydroxychoriquin wasn’t used. And the question is why?
I have no use for Soros. And I have no use for people like Klingenstein. Their elisltist wealth gives them the ability not only to tilt the scales, but put their thumb on it. As to Eastman, how did he and Trump get linked? And why has he never said Trump’s claims are correct?
As far as what you claim I am, that’s your call. I do admit I’ve moved over the years, largely due to stuff like this.
Agsin there’s a large segment of conservatives who don’t care what the election determined who the winner was. The rest mounting that mattered was Trump should have had his second term. Legally or not. I hear that often. I hear that in committee meetings. I hear that at candidate forums.
Irrelevant & immaterial as well. He didn't force it on anyone, he never tried to ruin the career or impugn anyone who rejected or talked down the available vaccine. He would have never mandated it.
I was noting when Trump got Covid, none of the treatments he was touting were used in his treatment. Hydroxychoriquin wasn’t used. And the question is why?
You question that because you don't know the truth. He did indeed use it. There was nothing else to use. In fact, he took Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic as well, but he either must not have been following the correct protocols or he lapsed in taking in on a continual basis.
I hate auto correct, as it often does it when I hit send.
Perhaps you need to disable it then, because it's not doing any good, as you have multiple misspellings. 7 in fact, that I counted, 4 within the very first highlighted entry from you, 1 in the second highlighted entry from you, 1 that follows this response by me, and 1 from the last highlighted entry from you. I thought perhaps, like me, you have macular degeneration or some other issue that impedes your ability to see correctly.
I have no use for Soros. And I have no use for people like Klingenstein. Their elisltist wealth gives them the ability not only to tilt the scales, but put their thumb on it. As to Eastman, how did he and Trump get linked? And why has he never said Trump’s claims are correct?
So you say, Tom Klingenstein seems like a person who is influencing the conservative causes. I guess as a Democrat you would fond objection to him, but you never speak badly about Zuckerberg or any of the other billionaires who influence in a negative fashion. Here Maine Public had to say about him in a Sept. 2022 article:
According to newly filed campaign finance disclosures, Klingenstein gave $100,000 to the Maine Families First PAC, which is led by the national conservative group the American Principles Project.
APP has been running ads in multiple states, including Maine, accusing Democrats of indoctrinating school kids with LGBTQ books and instruction.
Klingenstein has also given nearly $2 million to federal candidates and PACs in the current election cycle.
That includes donations to former Republican U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin, who is challenging 2nd District Democratic U.S. Rep. Jared Golden and independent Tiffany Bond.
Klingenstein's heightened public profile has come with increased scrutiny for him and for the Claremont Institute.
He defended institute scholar and attorney John Eastman for advising former President Donald Trump during his attempts to overturn the 2020 election.
And last year he used a speech to defend Trump as a necessary strongman in the life and death struggle against what he called "woke communism."
Sounds like a real bastard to me. /sarcasm
BTW, I don't think you have use for anyone, because you come off as a very bitter person who has nothing nice to say about anyone. You are incapable of finding any good in those trying to make a difference. You also do not appreciate anyone who tries to support this nation.
You're a sad little character in my eyes.
Agsin there’s a large segment of conservatives who don’t care what the election determined who the winner was. The rest mounting that mattered was Trump should have had his second term. Legally or not. I hear that often. I hear that in committee meetings. I hear that at candidate forums.
That's because that is what you want to see, because you suffer from TDS