I was curious about surety companies using real estate as collateral so I stumbled on this article. Companies may not necessarily be discriminating against Trump based on my read of this article.
Thx.....great read.....very informative.
I’m hearing that the fact that the judgement prevents Trump from doing business in New York for, I think, 2 years (maybe more) has complicated matters and made bondsmen more reluctant to underwrite Trump’s bond, as it puts their ability to recover the bond at greater risk, should Trump lose his appeal.
OK, troll.
Thanks for the info. It looks like it’s not bias against Trump (as far as surety companies refusing to help him make bond using his real estate as collateral). It’s really about there being few buyers with the kind of bucks to buy that property (thus the sureties being hesitant to accept the real estate as collateral).