Posted on 03/18/2024 10:09:24 PM PDT by CFW
The MAGA-friendly federal judge who keeps siding with Donald Trump in his Mar-a-Lago classified records case has forced prosecutors to make a stark choice: allow jurors to see a huge trove of national secrets or let him go.
U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon’s ultimatum Monday night came as a surprise twist in what could have been a simple order; one merely asking federal prosecutors and Trump’s lawyers for proposed jury instructions at the upcoming trial.
But as she has done repeatedly, Cannon used this otherwise innocuous legal step as yet another way to swing the case wildly in favor of the man who appointed her while he was president.
Department of Justice Special Counsel Jack Smith must now choose whether to allow jurors at the upcoming criminal trial to peruse through the many classified records found at the former president’s South Florida mansion or give jurors instructions that would effectively order them to acquit him.
Alternatively, Smith could appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, where more experienced judges have already overturned Cannon and reined her in. But doing that will only further delay a trial that’s at least three months behind schedule, entirely by the judge’s own design. (She froze the investigation and tried to slow-roll document review until the appellate court forced her to stop.)
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
Crossfire Hurricane operation.
Here is another article, also from a left wing view-point, CNN
I do not see how the “experts” can state the case has nothing to do with the Presidential Records Act since Trump was President when he declassified the documents and took them to Mar a Lago. Cannon is obviously not happy with the double-standards being applied to Biden versus Trump. If she had been appointed by Biden, the media would be calling her a “rising star in the judiciary”. But since she is a Trump appointee they have to disparage her every ruling.
If the evidence to too secret to show to a jury, and the prosecutor refuses to show the evidence, that is classic police state.
And this is WaPo’s article. The left is seriously butt-hurt over this Order by Judge Cannon. The Fulton County case is in shambles regardless of McAffee corrupt ruling and SCOTUS ruled states can’t take Trump off the ballot. The are beginning to worry they will not see Trump in prison prior to November. And, they had such high hopes.
What? Does the prosecutor expect to simply wave a manila folder in front of a jury and say “I have in my hand super secret documents that Trump mishandled?” He needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the documents are in fact classified and are the exact ones found at Mar-a-Lago. SND that they were mishandled AND that Trump could not legally have them or declassify them.
AND, this article is so biased, it was both painful and embarrassing to read.
True, but between the lines you could feel the pain of the author, and that gladdened my black heart.
Yahoo is the worst.
bttt
If a jury can’t see the evidence how would they determine the facts and reach a verdict? Would it just be on the government’s say-so?
“..allow jurors to see a huge trove of national secrets or let him go”
The proper procedure is to leak these to the legacy media then the jury can read it.
A jury is to determine facts. If the question of Trump’s guilt depends on him having mishandled documents which fall on the Espionage Act (which I claim does not apply to presidents)then the jury must see those documents to determine if they are indeed the “huge trove of national secrets.” We all know the docs will be heavily redacted anyway.
Obviously, the documents are not a national security threat. That’s why Trump declassified them.
"instructions that would effectively render him not guilty" Oh the horror!!!!! Can't possibly have exculpatory evidence being seen by anyone. Whatever the documents are they aren't much at all. What is more, there is no process for the President to declassify except that he can. The act of taking the documents is declassification. Done.
Might be hard to prove about seating arrangements at a state dinner.
No, the worst is having your wife read to you from yahoo with you pleading for her to stop it.
I can’t fathom a trial in which the evidence is never seen by the jury (nor presumably, by the judge). “Everybody knows that…” doesn’t fly in court, even for facts that might seem obvious. Nothing more than “Just trust me” from the prosecutor should lead to an automatic dismissal.
:NeverTrumpin':
BREAKING: President Trump files a DEFAMATION lawsuit against
@ABC and George Stephanopoulos for saying he was found liable for rape which he wasn’t.
I should have added: How would the prosecutor even show a specific document to a witness to have them authenticate it, without the “unwashed” jury seeing it? If not simultaneously shown to the jury, he could be showing the witness the Sunday comics for all they would know. Also, I would think the prosecutor would have to go through that exercise with every individual document.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.