Just mail in two box tops and you are a licensed lawyer....
1 posted on
03/17/2024 9:26:18 AM PDT by
llevrok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: llevrok
Maybe I should move there and become a lawyer.
2 posted on
03/17/2024 9:29:38 AM PDT by
HYPOCRACY
(Brandon's pronouns: Xi/Hur)
To: llevrok
Here’s what’s going to happen. People will visit the prospective lawyer and see he/she/it is not white. They’ll leave. So, any legitimate non-white lawyers will be hurt.
3 posted on
03/17/2024 9:30:07 AM PDT by
Gen.Blather
(Wait! I said that out loud? )
To: llevrok
Not good news when we are watching the Fani Willis Get Trump reality show and seeing what kind of morons are already making it over the bar.
We need to set a higher bar for lawyers, not eliminate it.
4 posted on
03/17/2024 9:30:51 AM PDT by
rdcbn1
To: llevrok
Why require law school? Which law school did Abraham Lincoln attend?
Professional licensing is just a scam to raise prices under the pretense that it protects the public.
5 posted on
03/17/2024 9:30:53 AM PDT by
devere
To: llevrok
And with that the one holdout elite profession not yet taken over by foreigners begins to topple.
7 posted on
03/17/2024 9:34:36 AM PDT by
Right Wing Vegan
(The one most called "dangerous" by minions of the pot normalization conspiracy)
To: llevrok
Soft bigotry of low expectations in action.
9 posted on
03/17/2024 9:35:43 AM PDT by
mrmeyer
(You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
To: llevrok
Do the states still require the bar exam ???
To: llevrok
Just pop in and we’ll stamp the capital L on your forehead
To: llevrok
That’s how it used to be.
I have no problem with this
12 posted on
03/17/2024 9:37:27 AM PDT by
Macoozie
(Roll MAGA, roll!)
To: llevrok
Why just not require them to get a liquor license?
13 posted on
03/17/2024 9:37:41 AM PDT by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: llevrok
" . . . the traditional test . . . is at best minimally effective” for ensuring competency . . . "
The Washington State Supreme Court is proof of that. They are biased and stupid, a bad combination.
To: llevrok
Wisconsin has had Diploma Privilege for law school graduates for quite some time.
17 posted on
03/17/2024 9:40:29 AM PDT by
Fury
To: llevrok
This will give the out of work Uber drivers options.
To: llevrok
19 posted on
03/17/2024 9:44:29 AM PDT by
Hattie
To: llevrok
“”...new attorneys who are so desperately needed around the state.”
I was unaware that there was a lawyer shortage. I was always under the impression that there are too many of them.
20 posted on
03/17/2024 9:46:10 AM PDT by
hanamizu
( )
To: llevrok
Frito Pendejo is happy about this. And he likes money.
To: llevrok
This is only and expressly to license those who can’t pass their bar exam.
To: llevrok
The CPA exam has been watered down over the years, too. Used to be it was given twice a year, in May and November. Now, I think it can be taken nearly every month.
Took me 3 times to pass it, but that was according to plan. Knocked out Theory and Practice the first time, second time was the following May, right after tax season. Passed the last two in November.
Essay questions got me over the hump. I had the same professor for 30+ hours, his tests were all essay.
27 posted on
03/17/2024 9:55:15 AM PDT by
Night Hides Not
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
To: llevrok
There will be three experiential-learning alternatives to the bar exam, each for people following a different path of legal study. The specifics, scale and implementation plan for the pathways have yet to be developed.
https://www.courts.wa.gov/newsinfo/?fa=newsinfo.pressdetail&newsid=50389
Create three experiential-learning alternatives to the bar exam, one for law-school graduates, one for law-school students, and one for APR 6 law clerks (who are enrolled in a non-law school course of study).
For graduates, this would entail a six-month apprenticeship under the guidance and supervision of a qualified attorney; during that time, the graduates would be required to complete three courses of standardized coursework.
For law students, the experiential pathway would allow them to graduate practice-ready by completing 12 qualifying skills credits and 500 hours of work as a licensed legal intern; they would be required to submit a portfolio of this work to waive the bar exam.
For law clerks (enrolled in a non-law school course of study), creation of additional standardized educational materials and benchmarks to be completed under the guidance of their tutors that dovetail with the requirements of the law school graduate apprenticeship, and 500 hours of work as a licensed legal intern to be eligible to waive the bar exam.
Who is in charge is more important than the methods. Leadership is key, will we have proper leadership? Place your bets....................
28 posted on
03/17/2024 9:55:26 AM PDT by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
To: llevrok
not enough blacks can pass the bar exam, so the lefts answer is simply to get rid of the exam!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson