Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GAgal

Hur had a slam dunk case. Biden’s state of confused mind and how he would be perceived by a sympathetic jury on the stand were irrelevant. He should have been prosecuted. The only elements of the crime are knowledge he had classified documents and willfully removing them from the SCIF and not returning them. Hur had Biden’s admissions to these elements during the interview. These admissions were admissible to establish the elements of the case at trial even if Biden was no longer lucid when tried. If this were a Democrat special prosecutor and the subject of the investigation was Trump, there is no way he would not have been prosecuted. Had Hur prosecuted Biden, it would have politically offset the Trump Florida documents lawfare case.


4 posted on 03/12/2024 9:20:04 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: chuckee
Had Hur prosecuted Biden, it would have politically offset the Trump Florida documents lawfare case.

Quite right. The Trump case was solely an attempt to offset Biden's exposure which the Biden admin knew was going to erupt. When the Biden case could no longer be suppressed, Hur had to dismiss it with this absurd rationale.

Senior citizens should see whether they get a "total walk" with this defense to any criminal charges they face.

16 posted on 03/12/2024 9:43:13 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Sheriff Jones of Ohio tells us with hard facts why each one of us is a frog in a pot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: chuckee

Hur had a slam dunk case.“

DC Court, DC Judge, DC Jury. No reasonable prosecutor would try to bring charges to a rat President. No chance for conviction, none.


23 posted on 03/12/2024 10:03:56 AM PDT by gibsonguy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: chuckee

Keep in mind, he wasn’t demented when he took those documents home, some of them from his days in the Senate.


25 posted on 03/12/2024 10:15:01 AM PDT by AppyPappy (Biden told Al Roker "America is back". Unfortunately, he meant back to the 1970's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: All

Hur was pursuing a hidden agenda, and surely knew he had
a slam dunk case against Biden. But Hur had other plans......

He was planning to spare Biden and get himself a high-pay,
no-show job as an Asian on Biden’s diversity merry go round.

It’s the only thing that makes sense.....since no one
in creation could be as gullible as Hur purported to be.


The only elements of the crime known include:
<><>hands-on knowledge Biden had classified documents
<><>he was willfully removing them from the SCIF
<><>he was not returning them.

Hur had Biden’s admissions to these elements during the interview.
These admissions were admissible in any court of
law to establish the elements of the case at trial
“even if” Biden was no longer lucid when tried.

Hur had a crack at a president who could place him in a better job.......
except Hur screwed it up bigtime angering both Dems and Repubs.

Hur’s reasoning was just plain stupid.


32 posted on 03/12/2024 10:34:47 AM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: chuckee

So you support b prosecution of Trump for the documents at Mar-a-Lago?


34 posted on 03/12/2024 10:41:48 AM PDT by Kathy in OC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: chuckee

“Had Hur prosecuted Biden, it would have politically offset the Trump Florida documents lawfare case.”

Good start. The other side of the situation is that if Biden had been prosecuted shouldn’t even be an issue. The required use of OPSEC actions are defined. If they are ignored at this level, then prosecution begins. If prosecution is pulled for mental or physical inability to follow those rules, then the individual in question has proven his unfitness to be assigned a security level even to sensitive level.

With the president running again for office, and being unable to hold a security level, then he is disqualified for the office as he cannot full fill the duties assigned. And that’s what they are frightened of. So why isn’t congress telling the public this and interveining on Biden’s efforts to re-election? All the evidence is there. He doesn’t have to be fined or jailed, just refused to be allowed to run for the office and immedaitely removed being unable to hold a clearance.

wy69


35 posted on 03/12/2024 10:42:12 AM PDT by whitney69 (yption tunnels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson