You keep arguing from the premise that the guy who wants 5 million dollars is correct and telling the truth.
He's not. He *DID* not prove what that data was. Therefore, he is *NOT* entitled to the money.
He just said it's "gibberish", which is exactly what anyone would claim of a packet data stream they couldn't decipher.
He may not have proved what the data was but he proved what the data was not and it was not anything to do with election hacking and as another poster pointed out even one of Lindell’s own engineers stated the information was bogus
You’re not offering anything but opinions supported by nothing I’ve provided background on the person who sod Lindell the information and his shady dealings and two courts ruling against Lindell and Lindell could resolve this entire situation by providing the data and methodology used to gather the information and decipher it which he has failed to do